UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to |
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
DATE | TIME | VIRTUAL ADDRESS | ||||||||
| 9:00 AM, EDT | virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PH2021 |
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
6035 Parkland Boulevard—Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OCTOBER 23, 2019
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:To Our Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Parker-Hannifin Corporation. The meeting will be held virtually via live webcast at our headquarters located at 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PH2021, on Wednesday, October 23, 2019,27, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, for the following purposes:
To elect |
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, |
To approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; |
|
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
Vote Via Internet | Vote By Phone | Vote By Mail | Vote at the Meeting | |||||||||
www.proxyvote.com | 800-690-6903 | Vote Processing c/o Broadridge 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 | www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ PH2021 |
Because of the ongoing impacts and uncertainty regarding the coronavirus pandemic, or COVID-19, we have decided that this year’s Annual Meeting will be virtual only. Similar to last year, the meeting will be conducted via live webcast, and you will be able to submit questions and vote your shares electronically. Please refer to the section “How to Attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders” for more information.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on August 30, 2019September 3, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. Your vote is important, so if you do not expect to attend the meeting, or if you do plan to attend but wish to vote by proxy, please mark, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card promptly in the envelope provided or vote electronically via the internet or by telephone in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. Please refer to the section “How to Attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders” and to the back page of this Proxy Statement for directions to attend the Annual Meeting.
Thank you for your support of Parker-Hannifin Corporation.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Joseph R. Leonti
| ||
Secretary |
September 23, 2019
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on October 23, 2019.27, 2021.
This Proxy Statement, along with our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2021, is available free of charge on our investor relations website (www.phstock.com).
| |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
7 | |||||
Nominees for Election As Directors for Terms Expiring in | 7 | ||||
13 | |||||
15 | |||||
15 | |||||
15 | |||||
15 | |||||
16 | |||||
Director Selection and Nomination, Qualifications and Diversity | 16 | ||||
17 | |||||
18 | |||||
18 | |||||
19 | |||||
21 | |||||
21 | |||||
22 | |||||
22 | |||||
22 | |||||
22 | |||||
23 | |||||
23 | |||||
Stock Ownership Restrictions - Speculative Transactions / Hedging | 23 | ||||
24 | |||||
24 | |||||
Objectives and Philosophies of the Executive Compensation Program | 24 | ||||
24 | |||||
“Pay-for-Performance”—Structure,Key Financial Metrics and Impact on Compensation | 25 | ||||
Administration, Oversight and Determination of Executive Compensation | 28 | ||||
28 | |||||
29 | |||||
29 | |||||
29 | |||||
General Policies and Practices Relating to Executive Compensation | 32 | ||||
32 | |||||
33 |
33 | ||||
33 | ||||
34 | ||||
35 | ||||
40 | ||||
43 | ||||
49 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
52 | ||||
54 | ||||
56 | ||||
58 | ||||
59 |
i
| |||||
60 | |||||
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control at June 30, | 61 | ||||
72 | |||||
73 | |||||
75 | |||||
Item 2 | 76 | ||||
78 | |||||
80 | |||||
82 | |||||
83 | |||||
83 | |||||
84 | |||||
|
ii
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ (i) |
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
6035 Parkland Boulevard—Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on October 23, 2019,27, 2021, and at all adjournments thereof. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on August 30, 2019,September 3, 2021 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. On August 30, 2019, 128,498,788September 3, 2021, 128,557,052 common shares were outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote. This Proxy Statement and the form of proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about September 23, 2019.24, 2021.
Our Global Code of Business Conduct, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and our Independence Standards for Directors are posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com. Shareholders may request copies of these documents, free of charge, by writing to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling(216) 896-3000. The information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement.
This summary highlights certain information relating to our 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our corporate governance and executive compensation. Additional details are found throughout this Proxy Statement.
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
| |||
|
| ||
| Board
| ||
|
| ||
| |||
|
| ||
Election of Directors | FOR ALL NOMINEES | ||
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor | FOR | ||
Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | FOR |
Business Highlights and Performance
In a year marked by an ongoing global pandemic, we delivered strong financial performance and value for our shareholders, including:
◆ |
|
◆ | Record cash flow from operations of $2.58 billion; |
◆ | Record net income, earnings per share and segment operating margins; |
◆ | Increased annual dividend per share for the 65th year in a row; and |
◆ | Significantly reduced our debt. |
The Win Strategy, our foundational business framework, drove sustained profitable growth and strong financial performance among our diversified industrial proxy peers. The actions taken under The Win Strategy to strengthen our portfolio and improve our performance have built a business that we believe is better equipped than ever before to be resilient across macro-economic cycles.
Approval of the Amended and Restated Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan
• | Our Purpose Statement: Enabling Engineering Breakthroughs that Lead to a Better Tomorrow continued to provide inspiration and direction for our team members, and represents how we can strengthen our communities and have a positive impact on the world.
|
We believe we are well-positioned to capitalize as the global economic recovery progresses.
|
|
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Response to COVID-19
The remarkable performance of our team members during the COVID-19 pandemic embodies the Parker culture and values that unite us. Throughout the pandemic, we have maintained manufacturing capacity across the enterprise, demonstrating the essential nature of Parker’s technologies around the world. Our team members continue to deliver technologies used in, among other applications, ventilators to treat those who are sick; engine filters and transmission components for heavy-duty trucks to transport food, water and supplies; aerospace rotorcraft products to support emergency transport of patients; refrigeration technologies to help keep food fresh and medicine viable; and many other technologies essential to people’s daily lives. Across countless critical applications, Parker products and systems continue to assist in the fight against COVID-19 and support its treatment around the world.
Safety is always our number one priority. We implemented heightened measures to promote safety in our facilities in response to the pandemic to protect our team members, including remote work and physical distancing protocols, among many others. We also were diligent about managing our costs, and implemented operational changes to weather the negative impact of the pandemic and economic downturn on our business.
Fiscal year 2021 was challenging, but our unrelenting focus on The Win Strategy drove us to record levels of performance. Guided by our Purpose, we believe we are well-positioned to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic stronger than ever before.
Board and Corporate Governance Highlights
Our Board of Directors is committed to sound corporate governance practices, promoting the long-term interests of our shareholders and holding itself and management accountable for our performance.
Fiscal year 2021 was significant with respect to the structure and composition of our Board. We added three new Directors in Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz and William F. Lacey, strengthening the culture, skills and gender and racial diversity of our Board. The metrics included in the graphics below reflect our Board structure and composition with our thirteen current Directors. Each Director nominee brings his or her own unique background and range of expertise, knowledge and experience which provides an optimal and diverse mix of skills and qualifications necessary for our Board to effectively fulfill its oversight responsibilities.
2 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
We are pleased to provide the following key governance sustainability and compensation highlights for fiscal year 2019.highlights. We believe these measures will better position us to continue to drive employeeteam member engagement, premier customer experience, profitable growth and financial performance and otherwise compete and win as a leading worldwide diversified manufacturer of motion and control technologies and systems.performance. In considering our governance and compensation programs for fiscal year 2019,2021, we utilized insights drawn from engagement with our shareholders and the results of our shareholder votes.
Our Board of Directors is committed to sound corporate governance and sustainability practices, promoting the long-term interests of our shareholders and holding itself and management accountable for our performance. The following table summarizes some of the key elements of our corporate governance framework.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 3 |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Corporate Governance Highlights
| ||||
• Added three new Directors in fiscal year 2021, strengthening the culture, skills and gender and racial diversity of our Board |
| |||
• Annual election ofall Directors |
| |||
|
| |||
• Published Corporate Governance Guidelines |
| |||
• Majority voting and resignation policy for uncontested Director elections |
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
• Director retirement is mandatory after reaching age 72 |
| |||
• Each Committee of our Board of Directors has a published charter that is reviewed and evaluated at least annually |
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
0-5 years:
| |||
|
| |||
Our Shareholder Engagement Efforts
We actively seek and highly value feedback from our shareholders. During fiscal year 2021, in addition to our traditional investor relations outreach efforts, we proactively reached out to shareholders representing approximately 54% of our outstanding common stock to engage with them on environmental, social and governance matters. Our outreach was accepted by, and we engaged with, shareholders representing approximately 21% of our outstanding common stock, covering a wide range of topics including:
COVID-19 response;
Environmental, climate and sustainability matters;
Executive compensation and our commitment to aligning pay with performance;
Board composition;
Board leadership structure;
Risk oversight and management;
Our corporate governance practices;
Business strategy; and
Other ESG topics, including human capital management and diversity.
4 | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
We also shared the feedback received during these meetings with our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee and our full Board of Directors. As a result of our shareholder engagement efforts and the feedback we received, we strengthened our disclosures in this Proxy Statement to provide additional information on our business performance and accomplishments, the structure and composition of our Board, our shareholder engagement efforts, and our ESG program.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Our ESG program includes a range of initiatives around corporate social responsibility and sustainability, taking into account the interests of our key stakeholders, including our shareholders, team members, customers and communities. Issues that we focus on include, among others, workplace health and safety, energy efficiency, waste management, climate risk, human capital management, diversity and inclusion, supply chain management and business ethics and compliance.
Our Board maintains oversight over ESG matters at the full Board level and through our relevant committees, while senior management manages and monitors such matters on a day-to-day basis throughout the year. The full Board reviews our ESG program at least annually.
We publish our Sustainability Report in line with Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards, addressing the many ways in which we apply our core technologies to make a positive impact on the world, including through our team members, social responsibility, environmental initiatives, product stewardship, and governance, ethics and compliance. The Report is available on our website at www.phstock.com. Selected aspects of our most recent Report are highlighted below:
● | Safety. Safety is a core value that all team members share, and our goal is to achieve a zero-incident workplace. To measure our safety progress, we have established long-term safety targets. Our goal is to be best in our peer group by 2023 and report zero serious safety incidents by 2025. We have reduced our Recordable Incident Rate by 72% from 2015 through 2020, including a 35% reduction improvement in 2020 over 2019. |
● | Environmental Stewardship. We are committed to driving sustainable, long-term growth and doing so in a way that makes the world a better place. |
We are committing to achieve carbon neutral operations by 2040. To ensure continued progress forward in minimizing our carbon footprint, we established a series of emissions targets, which include:
◆ | Reducing absolute emissions directly from our operations by 50% by 2030; |
◆ | Reducing indirect absolute emissions related to materials sourcing, logistics and services by 15% by 2030, and by 25% by 2040; and |
◆ | Achieving carbon neutral operations by 2040. |
Since 2010, we have reduced energy intensity (MWh/USD) by 42% and greenhouse gas intensity (MT/USD) by 50%.
We have reported energy and emissions data to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) since 2008, and in 2020 our Climate Change Score was again ranked in the top quartile among diversified industrial companies.
We recycle more than 85% of waste generated from our manufacturing operations, and we continue to reduce the volume of waste sent to landfills.
• | Since 2013, we have been a member of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency SmartWay® Transport Partnership aimed at identifying technologies and strategies to reduce carbon emissions and set goals and track progress towards reducing fuel consumption and improve the efficiency of freight transport. |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 5 |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
● | Diversity and Inclusion. An inclusive environment is a core tenet of our values and one of our key measures of success within The Win Strategy. In 2020, we appointed our first Vice President of Diversity and Inclusion to lead an ongoing commitment to an inclusive and welcoming workplace. We also established four global High Performance Teams (HPTs) focused on Talent Attraction, Talent Development, Governance and Knowledge. Each team is led by a senior executive and tasked with rethinking the way we attract and develop diverse candidates, share knowledge and track the impact of our efforts to ensure continued progress in fostering an inclusive culture. |
● | Parker-Hannifin Foundation. Parker-Hannifin Foundation donated nearly $6 million in total to hundreds of qualified charitable organizations in 2020, and $4 million in 2021 to date, with a focus on communities in need, education, disaster relief and energy and water conservation. |
We are proud of our corporate social responsibility and sustainability accomplishments, but recognize that best practices in ESG integration and reporting frameworks continue to evolve. While there is more work to be done, we are confident in our strategy of achieving business success through social responsibility and sustainable business practices.
Executive Compensation Highlights
The following table highlights some of the key aspects of our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2019.2021. This table is not a substitute for, nor does it purport to include, all of the information provided in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the Compensation Tables presented later in this Proxy Statement.
Executive Compensation Highlights
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
• As part of our company-wide cost control measures related to COVID-19 and the economic downturn, the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers were reduced beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020 and extended through the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 in amounts ranging from 20% to 50% of base salary. Further, the base salaries for our Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2021 were not increased over fiscal year 2020 levels |
6 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Shareholder approval is sought to elect Lee C. Banks, Robert G. Bohn,Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz, Linda S.A. Harty, William F. Lacey, Kevin A. Lobo, Candy M. Obourn, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier, James L. Wainscott and Thomas L. Williams as Directors for a term that will expire at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2020.2022.
Candy M. Obourn, who is currently serving as one of our Directors, will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.
Our Board of Directors has concluded that the nominees presented in this “Item 1—Election of Directors” collectively represent a highly-qualified and diverse group of individuals who will effectively serve the long-term interests of our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders. Our Board of Directors believes that each nominee should serve on our Board for the coming year based on his or her record of effective past service on our Board and the specific experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills described in his or her biographical information presented in this “Item 1—Election of Directors” section.
Should any nominee become unable to accept nomination or election, the proxies will be voted for the election of another person as our Board of Directors may recommend. However, our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that this circumstance will occur.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2020NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2022
Director Age: 58 Committees: None | LEE C. BANKS
Mr. Banks has been our Vice Chairman and President since August 2021. From February 2015 to August 2021 he was President and Chief Operating
Our Board
• extensive service as Vice Chairman and President, President and Chief Operating Officer, and
• intimate working knowledge of ourday-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives;
•
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors, our business, our Other Public Company Directorships: • Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec)(since 2020) • Nordson Corporation (former)(2010-2020) |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 7 |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Director since Age: 43 Committees (upon election): • Audit • Human Resources and Compensation |
Our Board believes that
• extensive service as
•
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • Chart Industries, Inc. (since 2018) • Alliant Energy Corporation (former)(2019-2021) |
Age: 58 Committees (upon election): • Corporate Governance and Nominating • Human Resources and Compensation | LANCE M. FRITZ Mr. Fritz has been Chairman of the Board of Union Pacific Corporation since October 2015, and President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2015. Our Board believes that Mr. Fritz will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things: • extensive service as President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific Corporation and other leadership positions at successful global companies of significant size; • service on other public company boards; • independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors; • proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and • high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • Union Pacific Corporation (since 2015) |
8 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Director since 2007 | Age: 61
• Corporate Governance and Nominating | LINDA A. HARTY
Now retired, Ms. Harty was Treasurer of Medtronic plc (medical technology) from February 2010 to April 2017.
Our Board believes that Ms. Harty will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• extensive service in senior finance and accounting leadership positions at Medtronic plc and other successful global companies of significant size;
• • former Certified Public accountant (CPA) and qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws; • independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors; • proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and • high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec)(since 2016) • Syneos Health, Inc. (since 2017) • Chart Industries, Inc. (since 2021) |
Director since 2021 Age: 56 Committees (upon election): • Audit • Corporate Governance and Nominating | WILLIAM F. LACEY Mr. Lacey has been President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Lighting (lighting technology), a Savant company, since January 2016. He previously served as Chief Financial Officer of GE Home and Business Solutions Lighting from 2011 to 2015. Our Board believes that Mr. Lacey will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things: • extensive service as President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Lighting and other General Electric businesses, all successful global companies of significant size; • independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors; • proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and • high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 9 |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Director Since: 2013 Age: 56 Committees: • Audit • Human Resources and Compensation | KEVIN A. LOBO Mr. Lobo has been Chairman of the Board of Stryker Corporation (medical technology) since July 2014 and has been Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director since October 2012. Our Board believes that Mr. Lobo will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things: • extensive service in senior leadership positions at Stryker Corporation and other successful global companies of significant size; • service on other public company boards;
• qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. |
|
| |
Director | Since: 2004 Age: 68
|
| JOSEPH SCAMINACE
Now retired, Mr. Scaminace
Our Board believes that Mr. Scaminace will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of OM Group, Inc., and prior leadership positions at other global industrial companies of significant size;
•
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • Cintas Corporation (since 2010)(Lead Director) |
10 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Director Age: 69 Committees: • Audit • Corporate Governance and Nominating | ÅKE SVENSSON
Mr. Svensson
Our Board believes that Mr. Svensson will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and President of Saab AB, a successful European aerospace, defense and security company of significant size;
• extensive knowledge of European aerospace, defense and security businesses and related issues and trends;
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. |
Director Since 2019 Age: 57 Committees: • Audit • Corporate Governance and Nominating | LAURA K. THOMPSON
Now retired, Ms. Thompson served as Executive Vice President of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (tire manufacturing) from December 2013 until her retirement in March 2019, and Chief Financial Officer of Goodyear from December 2013 until October 2018. | ||
Our Board believes that Ms. Thompson will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• extensive service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and in other key leadership positions at The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, a manufacturing company of significant size; • service on other public company boards;
• qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • Wesco International (since 2019) • Titan International, Inc. (since 2021) |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 11 |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Director Age: 58 Committees: • Audit • Human Resources and Compensation | JAMES R. VERRIER
Now retired, Mr. Verrier served as a Board Advisor to BorgWarner, Inc. (powertrain solutions) from August 1, 2018 until his retirement on February 28, 2019. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and
Our Board believes that Mr. Verrier will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• service as a director, Chief Executive Officer and President of BorgWarner, Inc., a successful publicly-traded global automotive industry components and parts supplier of significant size;
•
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • BorgWarner, Inc. (former)(2013-2018) |
Director | Age: 64
(Chair and Lead Director) • Human Resources and Compensation | JAMES L. WAINSCOTT
Now retired, Mr. Wainscott was Chairman of the Board of AK Steel Holding Corporation (steel producer) from January 2006 to May 2016; and President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of AK Steel Holding Corporation from October 2003 to January 2016.
Our Board believes that Mr. Wainscott will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• extensive service as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AK Steel Holding Corporation, a successful global industrial company of significant size;
•
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;
• proven ability to effectively serve as our Lead Director and to otherwise work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism. Other Public Company Directorships: • CSX Corporation (since 2020) |
12 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Director Age: 62 Committees: None | THOMAS L. WILLIAMS
Mr. Williams has been our Chairman of the Board since January 2016; and our Chief Executive Officer since February 2015. He was our Executive Vice President from August 2008 to February 2015 and our Operating Officer from November 2006 to February 2015.
Our Board believes that Mr. Williams will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our
• extensive service as Chief Executive Officer,
• intimate, working knowledge of ourday-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives;
•
• proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and
• high level of commitment to our Board of Directors, our business, our Other Public Company Directorships: • The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (since 2019) • Chart Industries, Inc. (former)(2008-2019) |
ANNUAL ELECTIONS; MAJORITY VOTING; NO CUMULATIVE VOTING
Our Amended and Restated Regulations provide for the annual election of our entire Board of Directors. Accordingly, each Director elected at this Annual Meeting of Shareholders will hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his or her successor is elected.
Our Amended Articles of Incorporation provide for a majority voting standard in the annual election of our Directors. Accordingly, at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders, each candidate for Director is elected only if the votes “for” the candidate exceed the votes “against” the candidate, unless the number of candidates exceeds the number of Directors to be elected. If the number of candidates exceeds the number of Directors to be elected, then in that election the candidates receiving the greatest number of votes shall be elected. Abstentions and brokernon-votes shall not be counted as votes “for” or “against” a candidate, and shareholders are not able to cumulate votes in the election of Directors.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 13 |
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
NEW ELECTIONS and DAND RETIREMENTSEPARTURES
On October 24, 2018,January 10, 2021, Robert J. Kohlhepp, Klaus-Peter Műller and Wolfgang R. SchmittG. Bohn retired from our Board of Directors in accordance with the mandatory Director retirement provisions of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.Directors. Immediately prior to those retirements,his retirement, Mr. KohlheppBohn served on the Audit and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Mr. Műller served onCommittees. Candy M. Obourn, who is currently serving as one of our Directors, will not stand for re-election at the Corporate GovernanceAnnual Meeting.
In fiscal year 2021, Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz and Nominating Committee, and Mr. Schmitt served on the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Laura K. Thompson wasWilliam F. Lacey were identified as a potential Director candidate by a third-party search firmcandidates and waswere evaluated by management and our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Upon our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendationrecommendations and as permitted under our Amended and Restated Regulations, our Board of Directors elected Ms. Thompson to our Board of DirectorsEvanko and Mr. Fritz on January 23, 201927, 2021, and Mr. Lacey on April 22, 2021, for a termterms expiring at this Annual Meeting of Shareholders. More detail and information on our Director recruiting, succession and refreshment process can be found under the caption “Director Selection and Nomination, Qualifications and Diversity.”
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 1: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR |
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 1:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR
EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
14 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MEETINGS AANDND ATTENDANCE; EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
During fiscal year 2019,2021, there were nineten meetings of our Board of Directors. Each Director attended at least 75% of the meetings held by our Board of Directors and the Committees of our Board of Directors on which he or she served.
We hold a regularly scheduled meeting of our Board of Directors in conjunction with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders absent an appropriate reason. AllWe held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders virtually in 2020 and all of the members of our Board of Directors at the time of our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders attended that meeting.and were available to answer shareholder questions.
In accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, ournon-management Directors are scheduled to meet regularly in executive sessions without management and, if required, our independent Directors will meet at least once annually. Additional meetings of ournon-management Directors may be scheduled from time to time when ournon-management Directors determine that such meetings are desirable. Ournon-management Directors met four times during fiscal year 2019.2021.
NUMBER; CURRENT TERM; RELATIONSHIPS
Our Board of Directors presently consists of eleventhirteen members. The current term of each member of our Board of Directors expires at our 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Assuming the election ofIf all of the Director nominees are elected, we expect our Board of Directors to consist of eleventwelve members after the 20192021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. None of our Directors are related to each other and no arrangements or understandings exist pursuant to which any Director was selected as a Director or Director nominee.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require at least a majority of our Directors to be “independent” as defined in the listing standards established by the New York Stock Exchange. Our Board of Directors has also adopted standards for Director independence, which are set forth in our Independence Standards for Directors.
We strongly favor a governance structure that includes an independent Board of Directors. Of the eleventhirteen current members of our Board of Directors, nineeleven are independent based on our Board of Directors’ consideration of the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. In addition, in fiscal year 2019, each of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors wasis composed entirely of independent Directors. As a result, our independent Directors directly oversee critical matters such as our executive compensation program for executive officers, our corporate governance guidelines,Corporate Governance Guidelines, policies and practices, the integrity of our financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting.
Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following nineeleven individuals who currently serve as Directors are independent: Robert G. Bohn,Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz, Linda S.A. Harty, William F. Lacey, Kevin A. Lobo, Candy M. Obourn, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier and James L. Wainscott.
Among other things, our Board of Directors does not consider a Director to be independent unless it affirmatively determines that the Director has no material relationship with us either directly or as a
partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors annually reviews and determines which of its members are independent based on the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. During such review, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors broadly considersconsider all facts and circumstances which it deemsthey deem relevant, including any commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships between us and any of our Directors.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 15 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In fiscal year 2019,2021, after considering the facts and circumstances applicable to each Director, our Board of Directors determined that each of Ms. Thompson,Evanko, and Messrs. LoboFritz, Lacey and VerrierLobo served as an executive officerofficers of a companycompanies that has anhave existing customer and/or supplier relationshiprelationships with us, and that each such relationshiprelationships required further analysis to confirm his or hertheir independence. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors further analyzed these relationships and found that noneeach of these DirectorsMs. Evanko, and Messrs. Fritz, Lacey and Lobo does not receive any direct or indirect personal benefits as a result of these relationships, and that the amounts paid to or by us under such relationships fell significantly below the thresholdsthreshold for independence provided in the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. Based on such further analyses,analysis, our Board of Directors affirmatively concluded that each of these DirectorsMs. Evanko, and Messrs. Fritz, Lacey and Lobo is independent.
Our Board of Directors currently employs a “dual leadership” structure. We have a Lead Director who is also the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and a Chairman of the Board, who is our Chief Executive Officer. Our Lead Director is elected solely by the independent members of our Board of Directors and holds a position separate and independent from our Chairman of the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will serve as our Lead Director and that the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is elected every five years.
The specific authorities, duties and responsibilities of our Lead Director are described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Among other things, our Lead Director presides over and supervises the conduct of all meetings of our independent Directors, calls meetings of our independent Directors, and prepares and approves all agendas and schedules for meetings of our Board.
Our Board believes that having a Lead Director who is elected by our independent Directors ensures that our Board will at all times have an independent Director in a leadership position. At the same time, our Board of Directors believes that it is important to maintain flexibility in its leadership structure to allow for a member of management to serve in a leadership position alongside the Lead Director if our Board of Directors determines that such a leadership structure best meets the needs of our Board, our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders.
Our Board has determined that this leadership structure is currently more efficient and effective than a structure which employs a single, independent Chairman of the Board. Our Board of Directors views this structure as one that ensures both independence in leadership and a balance of knowledge, power and authority. For example, our leadership structure employs both a Chairman of the Board who is also our Chief Executive Officer and who possesses an intimate working knowledge of ourday-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives, and a Lead Director who has a strong working relationship with ournon-management, independent Directors. These two individuals combine their unique knowledge and perspectives to ensure that management and our independent Directors work together as effectively as possible. Among other things, our Chairman of the Board ensures that our Board addresses strategic issues that management considers critical, while our Lead Director ensures that our Board addresses strategic issues that our independent Directors consider critical.
Our Board recognizes, however, that no single leadership model may always be appropriate. Accordingly, our Board of Directors regularly reviews its leadership structure to ensure that it continues to represent the most efficient and effective structure for our Board of Directors, our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders.
DIRECTOR SELECTION AANDND NOMINATION, QUALIFICATIONS AANDND DIVERSITY
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of our Board is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending potential Director candidates. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee ensures that Director recruiting, succession and refreshment are persistent areas of focus and regularly reviews the size, composition and independence of our Board, and any expected vacancies, in determining whether and to what extent to actively recruit new Directors or to replace departing Directors.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee utilizes a variety of methods and processes to identify potential Director candidates, including through reputable third-party search firms, unsolicited recommendations from other third-party search firms, and referrals from current or past members of our Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will give appropriate consideration to qualified persons
16 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
recommended by shareholders for nomination as Directors (provided that such recommendations comply with the procedures set forth under the caption “Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees”) and will consider such candidates on the same basis as candidates recommended by other sources. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee generally will not, however, consider recommendations for Director nominees submitted by individuals who are not affiliated with us.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has developed and implemented a robust process to ensure that its formal Director searches are appropriately scoped and designed to produce a slate of potential candidates representing a broad range of backgrounds, educations, experiences, skills and viewpoints that will enable them, individually and collectively, to address the issues affecting our Board, our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders, and optimize the functioning and decision-making and oversight roles of our Board and its Committees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee currently focuses on the following key search and evaluation criteria, but considers the entirety of each proposed candidate’s credentials and all available information that may be relevant to each candidate’s nomination.
Key Criteria | Overall Philosophy and Approach | |
Culture and Values | The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee places high value on cultural fit. Our Directors must be able to work together to | |
Diversity | The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee firmly believes diversity is critical to a well-functioning Board of Directors, and is committed to enhancing diversity on our Board. As a result, | |
Skills and Qualifications | The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also believes it is essential to have a Board with the range of skills and experience needed to effectively evaluate, monitor and oversee the wide range of considerations presented by the size and scope of our Company, operations, products and markets. As a result, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to identify nominees who are well equipped with a broad set of key skills, including the following:
| |
• | ||
• significant experience in corporate strategy, manufacturing, sales and marketing, industrial business, aerospace business, international | ||
• ability to effectively evaluate, monitor and oversee the most critical risks facing our business; | ||
• independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors.
|
Following its initial screening and evaluations, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may seek additional information regarding, and may request interviews with any candidate it wishes to further pursue. Based on all information reviewed and interviews conducted, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee collectively determines whether to recommend the candidate to our entire Board of Directors.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, utilizing its robust and thoughtful approach to Director recruiting, succession and refreshment, has built an experienced, diverse and independent Board that provides significant oversight over our plans and strategies for growth, financial performance and shareholder value creation.
Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees are collectively engaged in identifying, overseeing, evaluating and managing the material risks facing our business to ensure that our strategies and
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 17 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
objectives work to minimize such risks. Our Board of Directors has the ultimate responsibility to monitor the risks facing our business. Among other things, our Board of Directors reviews and discusses in detail, at least annually, our corporate strategy and annual operating plan, which covers significant strategic topics such as our key markets, operational priorities under The Win Strategy,™, strategic positioning, financial and operational outlooks, capital allocation, balance sheet strength, debt portfolio and positions, share repurchase activity, and dividend history and strategies. Our Board also maintains regular oversight of other key risk areas such as corporate strategy,including review at least annually of management succession planning, cybersecurity,cyber security, enterprise risk management, and environmental, social and governance matters.(ESG) matters, among others.
Various members of our management are responsible for ourday-to-day risk management activities, including members of our Human Resources, Internal Audit and Compliance, Legal, Tax, Risk Management, Treasury, Finance, and Information Technology departments, and our internal Cyber Security Committee. Those individuals are charged with identifying, overseeing, evaluating and managing risks in their areas of responsibility and for ensuring that any significant risks are addressed with our Board or the appropriate Board Committees. The Committees of our Board of Directors are each responsible for the various areas of risk oversight as described in the “Committees of our Board of Directors” section of this Proxy Statement. Management and the Chair of the applicable Committee ensure that any significant risks are reported to and addressed with the entire Board of Directors. Our Lead Director and the other Committee Chairs ensure that risk management is a recurring agenda item for meetings of our Board and its Committees.
Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees also engage outside advisors where appropriate to assist in the identification, oversight, evaluation and management of the risks facing our business. These outside advisors include our independent registered public accounting firm, external legal counsel and insurance providers, and the independent executive andnon-employee Director compensation consultant retained by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.Committee.
Our Board believes that its current level of independence, leadership structure and qualifications and diversity of its members facilitate the effective identification, oversight, evaluation and management of risk. Our Lead Director meets regularly with our other independent Directors without management to discuss current and potential risks and the means of mitigating those risks, and has the authority to direct and evaluate our risk management efforts.
Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees view the risk management role of our Board of Directors and its Committees, and their relationship with management in the identification, oversight, evaluation and management of risk, as paramount to the short-term viability and long-term
sustainability of our business. The ability to effectively monitor and oversee the most critical risks facing our business is a key consideration for our Board and its Committees in identifying potential Director nominees and evaluating our current Directors and Committee assignments.
COMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD COMMITTEES; COMMITTEE CHARTERS
Our Board has established and delegated certain authorities and responsibilities to three committees: the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Audit Committee. Each Committee of our Board is governed by a written charter which is posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com. Shareholders may request copies of these charters, free of charge, by writing to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling(216) 896-3000.
All members of each Committee are independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange as well as our Independence Standards for Directors. Each Committee regularly reports its activities to the full Board of Directors.
18 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Information about the current respective Committee purposes, memberships and number of meetings areis reflected in the following chart:table:
Directors
| Audit
| Corporate
| Human Resources
| |||
Linda A. Harty (ACFE) | CHAIR | ◆ | ||||
Kevin A. Lobo (ACFE) | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
Candy M. Obourn | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
Joseph Scaminace | ◆ | CHAIR | ||||
Åke Svensson | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
Laura K. Thompson (ACFE) | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
James R. Verrier | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
James L. Wainscott | CHAIR | ◆ | ||||
Fiscal Year 2021 Meetings | 5 | 5 | 4 |
If all of the current Director Nominees are elected at the Annual Shareholder Meeting, the Committee memberships will be as follows:
Directors
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
Corporate
|
|
| ||||
Jillian C. Evanko | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
| ◆ | ◆ | ||||
Linda A. Harty (ACFE) | CHAIR | ◆ | ||||
| ◆ | ◆ | ||||
| ◆ | ◆ | ||||
Joseph Scaminace | ◆ | CHAIR | ||||
Å | ◆ | ◆ | ||||
| ◆ | ◆ | ||||
James R. Verrier | ◆ | |||||
James L. Wainscott | CHAIR | ◆ |
* Committee Chair
Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Linda S.A. Harty, the Chair of the Audit Committee, and Kevin A. Lobo a member of the Audit Committee,and Laura K. Thompson are audit committee financial experts (designated in the above charttable as ACFE)(ACFE)) as defined in the federal securities laws.
Each of our Committees works with the applicable members of our Human Resources, Internal Audit and Compliance, Legal, Tax, Risk Management, Treasury, Finance, and Information Technology
departments and other management personnel to oversee and evaluate risks or relevant concerns to each Committee.
THE HUMAN RESOURCESAND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee oversees the administration, structure and determination of our executive compensation program. In addition, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee works with its independent executive compensation consultant and our human resources, legal and other management personnel to oversee and evaluate risks arising from and relating to our compensation policies and practices for all employees,team members, our succession planning and talent development strategies and initiatives, and other human resources issues facing our business.
In particular, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee monitors any significant existing or potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employeesteam members through its oversight of an
19 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
annual compensation risk review conducted by management and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant. The results of this review are evaluated and discussed among management, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and its independent executive compensation consultant and, if any significant risks are identified, the full Board of Directors. Based on the review conducted during fiscal year 2019,2021, we believe that our current compensation policies and practices are designed to mitigate risks related to compensation, and such policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.
The annual compensation risk review begins with a global assessment of any plans or programs that could potentially encourage excessive risk-taking or otherwise present significant risks to our business. The review also takes into account our individual business units to determine whether any of them carries a significant portion of our risk profile, structures compensation significantly different than others or is significantly more profitable than others.
The review then evaluates whether the applicable plans and programs are likely to encourage excessive risk-taking or detrimental behavior, vary significantly from our risk-reward structure, or otherwise present significant risks to our business.
During our fiscal year 20192021 compensation risk review, we also identified and evaluated various mechanisms that we currently have in place that may serve to mitigate any existing or potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, including the following:
our executive officers and other management-level employeesteam members are compensated with a mix of annual and long-term incentives, fixed andat-risk compensation, cash and multiple forms of equity compensation;
compensation packages gradually become more focused on long-term,at-risk and equity compensation as our employeesteam members ascend to and through management-level positions;
our global compensation plans and programs generally utilize the same or substantially similar performance measures;
we use multiple performance measures to determine payout levels under certain elements of incentive compensation and different performance measures for our annual incentives as compared to our long-term incentives;
the performance of our employeesteam members is not evaluated or measured based solely on changes in our stock price;
our incentive compensation programs generally limit payouts to a specified maximum, while those that do not are mitigated by other factors (e.g., stock appreciation rights are mitigated by long-term vesting periods and stock ownership guidelines);
we do not offer “guaranteed” bonuses and all of our incentive compensation elements carry downside risk for participants;
our executive officers are subject to specific stock ownership guidelines, a “claw-back”“claw back” policy and provisions requiring forfeiture of certain elements of incentive compensation upon termination for cause;under certain circumstances;
our compensation packages, including severance packages and supplemental pensions, are within market ranges;
the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has the discretion to assess the quality of our results in relation to our various performance measures and the risks taken to attain those results in approving final incentive payouts;
ourde-centralized decentralized organizational structure lessens the impact of any excessive risks taken by individual business units or operating groups; and
20 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
our employeesteam members are evaluated, measured and assessed based on their compliance with our Global Code of Business Conduct and other internal policies and controls, and the extent to which they act in the best interests of our business and our shareholders.
During the annual compensation risk review, we also consider whether any changes to our compensation plans and programs may be necessary to further mitigate risk. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee did not make any changes to our compensation plans and programs based on the results of our fiscal year 20192021 review.
THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAND NOMINATING COMMITTEE
Among other things, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending to our Board of Directors qualified nominees for election as Directors and qualified Directors for Committee membership, establishing evaluation procedures for the performance of our Board of Directors and its Committees, developing corporate governance guidelines and independence standards, and considering other matters regarding our corporate governance structure. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee works with our legal and other management personnel to oversee and evaluate:
Director independence, qualifications and diversity issues;
Board of Directors and Committee leadership, composition, function and effectiveness;
alignment of the interests of our shareholders with the performance of our Board of Directors;
compliance with applicable corporate governance rules and standards; and
other corporate governance issues and trends.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is our standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Each member of our Audit Committee is independent, as defined in our Independence Standards for Directors and in compliance with the independence standards applicable to audit committee members under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and under the federal securities laws.
Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, compensating, retaining, and overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm and evaluating its independence, approving all audit andnon-audit engagements with our independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing our annual and quarterly financial statements, internal and independent audit plans, the results of such audits and the adequacy of our internal control structure.
In addition, the Audit Committee works with our internal audit and compliance, legal, tax, treasury and finance departments and other management personnel to oversee and evaluate risks, including major financial, tax, strategic, and operational risk exposures and risks related to compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and significant litigation and claims.
The Audit Committee also meets privately at each of its meetings with representatives from our independent registered public accounting firm and our Vice President – Audit, Compliance and Enterprise Risk Management.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 21 |
REVIEWAND APPROVALOF TRANSACTIONSWITH RELATED PERSONS
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for considering questions of possible conflicts of interest of Directors and executive officers and for making recommendations to prevent, minimize or eliminate such conflicts of interest. Our Global Code of Business Conduct provides that our Directors, officers, employeesand other team members and their spouses and other close family members must avoid interests or activities that create any actual or potential conflict of interest. These restrictions cover, among other things, interests or activities that result in receipt of improper personal benefits by any person as a result of his or her position as our Director, officer, employeeor other team member or as a spouse or other close family member of any of our Directors, officers or employees.other team members. Our Global Code of Business Conduct also requires our Directors, officers and employeesother team members to promptly disclose any potential conflicts of interest to our Corporate Compliance Office. We also require that each of our executive officers and Directors complete a detailed annual questionnaire that requires, among other things, disclosure of any transactions with a related person meeting the minimum threshold for disclosure under the relevant U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules. All responses to the annual questionnaires are reviewed and analyzed by our legal counsel and, as necessary or appropriate, presented to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for analysis, consideration and, if appropriate, approval.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the following in determining if any transaction with a related person or party should be approved, ratified or rejected:
the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;
the material terms of the transaction;
the importance of the transaction to the related person and to us;
whether the transaction would impair the judgment or the exercise of the fiduciary obligations of any Director or executive officer;
the possible alternatives to entering into the transaction;
whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those available to third parties; and
the potential for an actual or apparent conflict of interest.
During fiscal year 2019,2021, we reviewed the annual questionnaires and determined that no related-party transactions exist. This review included a detailed evaluation of the transactions reviewed and analyzed by our Board of Directors in determining Director independence as described in the “Director Independence” section of this Proxy Statement. Based on management’s review and analysis, no actual or potential related-party transactions were presented to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for analysis, consideration or approval.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A)16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers, Directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our Common Shares to file initial stock ownership reports and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC regulations require that we receive copies of these reports. Based solely on a review of these reports, as filed electronically with the SEC during fiscal year 2021, and upon written representations from our executive officers and Directors, we believe that all Directors, Officers and 10% or greater beneficial owners complied with all such filing requirements for fiscal year 2019,2021, except that (i) Catherine A. Suever, Executive Vice President – Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer, filed onedue to administrative error a late Form 4 was filed on May 18, 2021 for Mr. Malone with respect to correct the inadvertent underreporting of 1,620 shares awarded to her, and (ii) Robert G. Bohn, Director, filed one late Form 4 to report 120 shares acquired through a broker dividend reinvestment plan.two transactions that occurred on May 7, 2021.
In 2018, our Shareholders approved an amendment to our Code of Regulations (subsequently restated and namedOur Amended and Restated Regulations) toRegulations permit a shareholder, or a group of up to twenty shareholders, owning three percent or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include the Company’s annual meeting proxy materials a number of director nominees up to a greater of (x) two, or (y) twenty percent of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in theour Amended and Restated Regulations.
22 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
OTHER GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Our Board of Directors maintains a “claw-back”“claw back” policy which allows us to recover or withhold any Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses, Converted RONA Bonuses or LTIP Awards which are paid or payable to an executive officer if:
payment, grant or vesting was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement of any of our financial statements filed with the SEC;
our Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion that the fraud or misconduct of the executive officer caused or contributed to the need for the restatement;
the amount that would have been paid or payable to the executive officer would have been less if the financial results had been properly reported; and
our Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion that it is in our best interests and in the best interests of our shareholders to require the executive officer to repay or forfeit all or any portion of the amount paid or payable.
In 2015 our Board of Directors approved amendedOur stock ownership guidelines to further align the financial interests of our executive officers and Directors with those of our shareholders by encouraging the accumulation and retention of our common stock by our Directors and executive officers. The currentOur Board of Directors has approved the following amended stock ownership guidelines for our Directors and executive officers are as follows:officers:
Participants
| Guidelines
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | Six times annual base salary | |||
| Four times annual base salary | |||
Chief Operating Officer | Four times annual base salary | |||
Executive or Senior Vice Presidents | Three times annual base salary | |||
Other | Two times annual base salary | |||
Non-Management Directors | Five times annual retainer |
|
The recommended time period for achieving compliance with the guidelines is five years from election or appointment to the position that is subject to the guidelines. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews share ownership information with the Chief Executive Officer in August of each year to ensure compliance with the guidelines. As of June 30, 2019,2021, all executive officers and Directors in their positions for at least five years were in compliance with the guidelines.
STOCK OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS - SPECULATIVESPECULATIVE TRANSACTIONS / HEDGING
We maintain an insider trading policy that applies to all of our Directors, officers, employeesother team members and consultants. The insider trading policy prohibits those covered by the policy from engaging in speculative transactions with respect to Company securities that could lead to inadvertent violations of securities laws, such as short sales and acquiring exchange-traded options (including puts, calls and other derivatives). Furthermore, the insider trading policy prohibits certain arrangements that could result in sales or transfers of Company securities without the covered person’s consent at times at which he or she is not permitted to trade in Company securities, including holding Company securities in margin accounts or pledging them as collateral.
The insider trading policy also prohibits those covered by the policy from entering into hedging or monetization transactions (such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts) with respect to Company securities, because such transactions may provide ownership of Company securities without the full risks and rewards of such ownership.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 23 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—FISCAL YEAR 20192021
Objectives and Philosophies of the Executive Compensation Program
The Win StrategyTM™ has been the foundation of our business and has represented the unified strategic vision of our employeesteam members worldwide since it was first introduced in 2001. The Win Strategy defines the key goals, operational priorities and metrics used to profitably grow our business. We are confident that our continuing focus on The Win Strategy maximizes long-term shareholder value by helping us realize our goal oftop-quartile performance among our competitors and peers and steady appreciation of our stock price.
The Win Strategy also provides the means by which we measure and reward success. In fact, the objective of our executive compensation program is to encourage and reward performance that implements the strategies and advances the goals of The Win Strategy. The program is designed to:
align the financial interests of our executive officers and our shareholders by encouraging and rewarding our executive officers for performance that achieves or exceeds significant financial and operational performance goals and by holding them accountable for results;
encourage and reward our executive officers for experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership, leadership qualities, advancement, individual accomplishment and other significant contributions to the enhancement of shareholder value and to the success of our business;
provide market competitive compensation to attract, retain and motivate highly-talented and ethical individuals at all levels who are focused on the long-term success of our business and who are equipped, motivated and poised to lead and manage our business presently and in the future;
promote accountability by providing executive officers a mix of cash and equity compensation, allocating a greater proportion of the compensation for executive officers, as compared to other employees,team members, to elements that are dependent on the performance of our business; and
maintain a level of flexibility sufficient to adjust for trends and changes in the continuously evolving global business and regulatory environment.
Categories and Elements of Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation program covers all compensation paid to our executive officers. OurIn fiscal year 2021 our executive officers include,included, among others, our Chief Executive Officer, our former and present Chief Financial OfficerOfficers and our three other most highly compensated executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019,2021, which we refer to as the Named Executive Officers.
On December 31, 2020, Catherine A. Suever retired as Executive Vice President - Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer. On October 28, 2020, Todd M. Leombruno was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective January 1, 2021.
Our executive compensation program offers the categories and elements of compensation identified in the following table. Each element of compensation is more specifically defined and described in the “Elements of Executive Compensation” section beginning on the page indicated in the table.
24 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Category of Compensation
| Element(s) of Compensation
| Defined/Described
| ||
| ||||
Base Salaries
| Base Salaries | Page
| ||
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation | Target Incentive Bonuses General RONA Bonuses Converted RONA Bonuses PGI Plan
| Page 35 Page Page Page 39
| ||
Long-Term Incentive Compensation | LTIP Awards Stock Incentives
| Page 40 Page
| ||
Employee Benefits
| Various
| Page
| ||
Executive Perquisites
| Various
| Page
|
“Pay-for-Performance”—Structure, —Structure, Key Financial Metrics and Impact on Compensation
Our executive compensation program is structured to ensure that a significant portion of the compensation for executive officers is dependent upon the performance of our business. This“pay-for-performance” structure drives the program to achieve its objective to encourage and reward performance that implements the strategies and advances the goals of The Win Strategy. Our program is also structured to ensure that the compensation for our executive officers is not overly weighted toward annual cash incentive compensation and does not otherwise have the potential to threaten long-term shareholder value by promoting unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by our executive officers. The “Allocation of Executive Compensation” section describes our policies and practices for allocating executive compensation among the various categories and elements.
To illustrate, the following chart shows the mix of fixed andat-risk annual and long-term cash and equity compensation represented by base salaries and the elements of annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation for the Named Executive Officers.Officers for fiscal year 2021 at target levels. The percentages of total target compensation reflected in this chart were calculated using each Named Executive Officer’s fiscal year 20192021 base salary (as set in August 2020 without accounting for base salary reductions that were applicable in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 in response to the economic downturn and COVID-19), target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term incentive compensation. Importantly, other than the base salary reduction, we did not modify any executive compensation target amounts or performance metrics in response to COVID-19 or any other business or economic challenges in fiscal year 2021.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 25 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The “Elements of Executive Compensation” section provides detailed discussion and analysis regarding how each element of compensation encourages and rewards performance that implements the strategies and advances the goals of The Win Strategy. Our compensation structure includes both fixed andat-risk compensation comprised of various cash and equity elements, which is structured generally as follows:
26 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
* General RONA and Converted RONA, which are based on our return on net assets.
We provide base salaries, employee benefits and executive perquisites primarily to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive to attract, retain and motivate the individuals needed to implement and advance our strategies and goals. In addition, as illustrated in the following
table, we provide each element of annual cash incentive compensation and each element of long-term incentive compensation primarily to encourage and reward performance that implements and advances The Win Strategy, in particular, our strategies and goals relating to financial performance and profitable growth, aligning such elements with our performance in certain key financial metrics that we use to measure the overall performance of our business.
We also ensure that base salary adjustments consider performance and results in certain ESG-related metrics embedded in The Win Strategy, such as, among others, team member safety, engagement and inclusion. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee also recognizes the potential for incorporating ESG-related metrics into our incentive compensation plans and programs and will continue to consider and evaluate appropriate opportunities to do so within our executive compensation program.
The following table shows the behaviors, key financial metrics and fiscal year 20192021 results driven by each element ofat-risk compensation provided to the Named Executive Officers.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
| 27 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
* Free cash flow margin is calculated as disclosed on page 3536.
** Officer participation onin our Profitable Growth Incentive Plan is limited to our operating group presidents; as such, Mr. MaloneWeeks (Vice President and President—FiltrationEngineered Materials Group) and Ms. Parmentier (Vice President and President—Motion Systems Group) areis the only Named Executive OfficersOfficer who werewas eligible for the Profitable Growth Incentive Plan in fiscal year 2019.2021.
ADMINISTRATION, OVERSIGHT AANDND DETERMINATION OOFF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee, which we refer to in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as the Committee, consists solely of independent Directors and has various duties and responsibilities with respect to the administration, oversight and determination of executive compensation. As described in the Committee’s Charter, which is posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com, these duties and responsibilities include:
28 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
establishing our executive compensation program and philosophies and overseeing their development and implementation;
reviewing and approving the performance and compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; and
performing other duties and responsibilities assigned by our Board of Directors.
The Committee also retains the discretion to authorize periodic compensation adjustments due to promotions or increases in the responsibilities of our executive officers.
In fulfilling its duties and responsibilities, the Committee seeks periodic input, advice and recommendations from various sources, including our Board of Directors, our executive officers and the Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant. The Committee is not bound by that input or advice or those recommendations. The Committee at all times exercises independent discretion in its executive compensation decisions.
Our Board of Directors approves all incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans reviewed and recommended by the Committee and all other plans and programs which, by their terms, require approval of our Board. Our Board does not authorize or approve any other specific executive compensation matters. Our Board of Directors oversees the Committee’s activities and performance, including the identification, evaluation and monitoring of risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, and reviews all material information relating to executive compensation matters approved by the Committee. This oversight ensures that the Committee fulfills its duties and responsibilities and that the executive compensation program is reasonable and appropriate, meets its objectives and effectively serves the interests of our business and our shareholders.
Our executive officers also play a role in the administration, oversight and determination of executive compensation. At the beginning of each fiscal year, each executive officer sets annual performance goals for his or her direct reports, which may include other executive officers. The performance goals are designed to promote individual performance consistent with the strategies and goals of The Win Strategy. Throughout the fiscal year, each executive officer’s performance is reviewed and evaluated against his or her performance goals. At the end of the fiscal year, each executive officer conducts a final performance review for each of his or her direct reports. Based on those reviews, our executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, recommend any annual compensation adjustments and awards for their executive officer direct reports to our Chief Executive Officer.
Our Chief Executive Officer similarly reviews and evaluates his direct reports, which include each of the other Named Executive Officers except for Mr. Malone and Ms. ParmentierWeeks who arewas reviewed
and evaluated by Mr. Banks. Our Chief Executive Officer also reviews and evaluates the recommendations made with respect to all of our other executive officers and makes any modifications that he deems appropriate. Our Chief Executive Officer then recommends to the Committee annual compensation adjustments and awards for all of our executive officers other than himself.
Our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Operating Officer,President, our Executive Vice President—Human Resources & External Affairs and our Secretary attend all meetings of the Committee other than executive sessions, and neither our Chief Executive Officer nor our Chief Operating OfficerPresident attends any meetings relating to his performance or compensation. Our executive officers prepare and provide to the Committee performance summaries for certain executive officers, which are used by the Committee to understand and measure the performance and effectiveness of our annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. Our executive officers also periodically consult with and assist the Committee in calculating incentive compensation payouts, establishing and monitoring performance goals and addressing other appropriate executive compensation matters.
COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS AANDND BENCHMARKING
The Committee regularly monitors, reviews and evaluates our executive compensation program to ensure that it provides reasonable compensation ranges at competitive, appropriate and effective levels. The Committee engages Mercer Human Resource Consulting, an independent human resources and compensation consulting firm, which we refer to as Mercer, to assist the Committee in its monitoring, review and evaluation responsibilities, and to otherwise provide assistance and guidance to the Committee on executive officer and Director compensation matters. Mercer is a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. The Committee first engaged
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 29 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Mercer in fiscal year 2009 following a robust procurement process involving multiple consulting firms. The Committee selected Mercer based on its level of expertise and financial and strategic fit. Mercer reports directly to the Committee and attends all meetings of the Committee. The Committee has sole authority for the appointment, removal, replacement, compensation and oversight of Mercer and its affiliates for executive officer and Director compensation matters.
Mercer provides a wide range of executive officer and Director compensation consulting services for the Committee. Mercer prepares and provides to the Committee a comprehensive annual review of base salaries, target annual cash incentive compensation, target long-term incentive compensation and target total cash and direct compensation for all of our executive officers. Mercer uses this annual review to advise the Committee with respect to the effectiveness and competitiveness of our executive compensation program. The Committee considers this annual review when establishing compensation levels and otherwise to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive and effective.
Mercer uses proxy statement data and surveys published by leading human resources and compensation consultants to conduct market analyses of base salaries, target annual bonuses, target long-term incentive compensation and target total cash and direct compensation offered to executives of other diversified industrial companies with revenues and market values comparable to ours, which we refer to as the Peer Group or Peer Group companies. Mercer also uses broader market data on companies outside of the Peer Group to the extent that it is available and appropriate.
The Committee regularly reviews and, when necessary or advisable, updates the Peer Group to make sure it consists of companies that directly compete with us for talented employeesteam members and shareholder investment, and it otherwise represents a meaningful group of peers. In evaluating the Peer Group companies, the Committee looks for companies in the Diversified Industrials sector with
characteristics and business strategies similar to ours. TheFor fiscal year 2021, the Committee removed SPX Flow, Inc. from the Peer Group, replacing it with Ingersoll Rand Inc. as a more appropriate comparator. Except for those changes, the Peer Group companies for fiscal year 20192021 remained the same as fiscal year 20182020 and consisted of the following companies:
Peer Group Companies | ||||
• Caterpillar Inc. | • Eaton Corporation plc | • | ||
• Colfax Corporation | • Emerson Electric Co. | • ITT | ||
• Cummins Inc. | • Flowserve Corporation | • Johnson Controls International plc | ||
• Danaher Corporation | • Fortive Corporation | • Rockwell Automation, Inc. | ||
• Deere & Company | • Honeywell International Inc. | • | ||
• Dover Corporation | • Illinois Tool Works Inc. | • |
Mercer also provided other compensation consulting services to the Committee during fiscal year 2019,2021, including:
preparing for and participating in the Committee’s meetings and conference calls, including advance and subsequent meetings with the chair of the Committee and senior management;
conducting apay-for-performance review to evaluate the level of alignment between our executive compensation program and performance levels relative to our Peer Group companies;
preparing and providing to the Committee a comprehensive review of compensation provided to ournon-management Directors;
assessing our free-cash flow performance versus peers over a one, three and five-year period;
working with management to conduct the annual compensation risk review; and
periodically assisting management on other select executive compensation topics.
In fiscal year 2019,2021, we paid $232,945$232,291 in fees, administrative charges,out-of-pocket expenses and other costs to Mercer for executive officer and Director compensation consulting services provided to the Committee.
30 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
We also directly engage Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its affiliates (including Mercer) in the ordinary course of business, without the approval of our Board of Directors or the Committee, to provide services in areas other than executive officer and Director compensation. These additional services included:
consulting services regarding life insurance, prescription drug and other benefits programs for our employeesteam members generally;
consulting services regarding investment options available under our benefit plans for our employeesteam members generally;
providing benchmarking surveys for information on compensation and benefits for our employeesteam members generally; and
providing services as an insurance broker.
In fiscal year 2019,2021, we paid $1,242,045$1,073,407 in fees, administrative charges, commissions,out-of-pocket expenses and other costs to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its affiliates (including Mercer) for these additional services. The majority of these fees were not paid pursuant to
engagements of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. by management, but were rather either paid by our third-party administrators to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. relating to risk insurance and for insurance and prescription drug services provided under our employeeteam member health and welfare plans, or were direct engagements with Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. made by various divisions worldwide for market surveys related to those particular divisions. The consolidated revenues of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. were $14.95$17.2 billion as reported in its Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2020.
The Committee has considered and assessed all relevant factors, including but not limited to those set forth in Rule10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to Mercer. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflict of interest that has been raised by the work performed by Mercer. The Committee also periodically reviews the relationship with Mercer to determine whether sufficient internal safeguards are in place to ensure that Mercer provides services to the Committee independent of any influence from management. The Committee identified the following safeguards:
Mercer reports directly to the Committee and not to management on executive officer and Director compensation matters;
at each Committee meeting, Mercer and the Committee meet in executive session without members of management present;
allnon-executive compensation services are provided by Mercer consultants who are not involved in providing executive officer and Director compensation consulting services to the Committee;
the Committee has exclusive authority to retain and set the compensation for Mercer’s executive officer and Director compensation consulting services;
the individual Mercer consultants to the Committee do not provide any services to us other than those provided for the Committee;
the individual Mercer consultants to the Committee do not participate in any client development activities that are not directly related to executive officer or Director compensation services for the Committee; and
the amounts paid to Mercer by the Committee are not directly impacted by any growth in the fees we pay to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its affiliates (including Mercer).
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 31 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
GENERAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONGENERAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Allocation of Executive Compensation
The Committee seeks to provide compensation, employee benefits and executive perquisites which are competitive with the market and help us attract, retain and motivate present and future executive officers. Annually, base salaries, target annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation for each executive officer is compared to the median of companies included in Mercer’s annual review with the objective that, in the aggregate, our target compensation generally remains at the median of the Peer Group companies.
When deciding whether to increase or decrease the amount of any element of compensation, the Committee considers Mercer’s annual review, the annual performance reviews of the executive officers and the performance of our business as a whole. The Committee does not consider amounts realized from prior compensation in determining the levels of compensation paid to executive officers.
To ensure that our executive compensation program meets its objectives to drive and support The Win Strategy, the Committee allocates the majority of compensation for executive officers to annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. Each of theat-risk elements of compensation within those categories is directly tied to appreciation of our stock price and/or to significant financial and operational performance goals. More thanone-half of the targeted total compensation for the executive officers is, therefore, “at risk”“at-risk” and may significantly fluctuate from year to year based on our financial, operational and stock performance. In addition, the Committee makes sure that executive officers have a greater proportion of their total compensation allocated to theseat-risk elements than other employees.team members. The Committee structures the program in this manner to better align the financial interests of our executive officers with the financial interests of our shareholders, to better ensure a“pay-for-performance” result and to promote internal equity by recognizing that our executive officers, as compared to other employees,team members, have greater responsibility and influence over the performance of our business.
Our executive compensation program is also structured to offer a reasonable balance of annual and long-term, as well as cash and equity, elements of compensation. The program provides a mix of those elements specifically designed to encourage and reward performance that contributes to the advancement of The Win Strategy. The Committee does not have any formal policies or guidelines with respect to the allocation of executive compensation between annual and long-term elements, cash and equity elements or different forms of equity elements. In practice, however, the Committee has taken the following approaches.
• | Allocation between annual and long-term elements. The Committee considers Mercer’s annual review as it sets each executive officer’s base salary and annual cash incentive compensation to ensure that it is reasonable in the context of the midpoint value of his or her comparable position within the Peer Group. The Committee also considers Mercer’s annual review as it sets the total target value of each executive officer’s long-term incentive compensation as a multiple of the midpoint of the base salary range of his or her comparable position within the Peer Group companies. |
• | Allocation between cash and equity elements. Base salaries and annual cash incentive compensation are paid in cash. Long-term incentive compensation is generally paid in equity because of the long-term nature of equity awards and our desire to encourage performance that drives long-term shareholder value. |
• | Allocation between different forms of equity elements. The Committee generally allocates 50% of the total target value of each executive officer’s long-term incentive compensation to LTIP Awards and 50% to Stock Incentives. The Committee takes this approach to balance the allocation between elements based on long-term financial, operational and strategic metrics and those based on long-term performance of our common stock. |
The Committee generally makes all elements of executive compensation available to all executive officers and makes executive compensation decisions on a consistent and equitable basis. The Committee generally does not offer any element to an executive officer that is not available to other executive officers. As described beginning on page 39, however, the PG RONA Multiplier is applied only to our operating group presidents, and, therefore, Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier areWeeks is our only Named Executive OfficersOfficer to whom the PG RONA Multiplier was applied in fiscal year 2019.2021. The Committee also occasionally grants retention and/or recognition awards to executive officers who make
32 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
extraordinary contributions to the Company’s success, or for whom a retention incentive is appropriate.appropriate, but made no such grants in fiscal year 2021.
Accounting and Tax Considerations
Our executive compensation program is structured to achieve flexibility, maximize benefits and minimize detriments to our business and our executive officers from a tax and accounting perspective. As a result, we continuously review and evaluate the impact of changes in tax laws and accounting practices and interpretations and similar factors affecting our executive compensation program. For example, Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718, which results in recognition of compensation expense for Stock Incentives, and Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which impacts deferred compensation arrangements, are considered as we evaluate structure and implement changes to the program.
In addition, ourOur executive compensation program has historically been designed to allow us to deduct compensation payments for tax purposes. For example, whileWith the Committee believes that tax deduction is only oneenactment of several relevant considerations in setting compensation, the Committee generally tried to make sure that annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation qualified as fully deductible “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enactedon December 22, 2017, included a number of significant changes to Section 162(m), such as the repeal ofhowever, the “performance-based” compensation exemption andto the expansion$1,000,000 annual cap on the deductibility of compensation paid to “covered employees” was repealed and the definition of “covered employees” was expanded (for example, by including the chief financial officer as a covered employee). As a result of these changes, compensation to each Named Executive Officer in excess of $1,000,000 generally will no longer be tax deductible. In addition, each Named Executive Officer will be subject to the limit under Section 162(m) for all future tax years. We will continue to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) to the extent to which our outstanding awards are determined to be tax deductible under the transitional relief; however, there are still uncertainties regarding the scope of transitional relief available. The Committee may also determine that certain good governance practices of Section 162(m) should remain in place, such as establishing performance goals within the first ninety days of a performance period, selecting performance goals that are set forth in our 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and requiring the Committee to certify results prior to the payout of any award. The Committee, however, reserves the right to modify any compensation program if it determines that such modification is consistent with our business needs.
The Committee does not change thepre-determined performance goals or increase the amount of anyat-risk compensation following the grant date except as permitted by applicable laws and regulations. The Committee may increase the amount of any award of annual cash incentive compensation made outside of the Performance Bonus Plan if appropriate to account for corporate policy changes, executive compensation program changes and major corporate programs, and to account for the negative impact of acquisitions on goodwill and amortization expense, losses on dispositions of real property during plant moves or shutdowns and other unexpected occurrences that negatively impact awards. The Committee has historically exercised this discretion only with respect to General RONA Bonuses (to encourage our employees to engage in activities and initiatives that drive and support The Win Strategy but may have an adverse impact on General RONA Bonuses), and once used such discretion with respect to Target Incentive Bonuses.
The Committee may reduce the amount of any award of annual cash incentive compensation or long-term incentive compensation made outside of the Performance Bonus Plan other than Stock Incentives. The Committee also has the discretion to reduce the amount of any award made under the Performance Bonus Plan as long as the award, if eligible for such treatment, continues to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m). The Committee retains this downward discretion for the following purposes:
to ensure greater control over final performance-based compensation amounts based on its assessment of the quality of our results relative to our various performance measures, the risks taken to attain those results and our overall financial performance;
to ensure that performance-based compensation continues to effectively serve the interests of our business and our shareholders; and
to avoid inappropriately rewarding executive officers based on events or circumstances that were not expected at the beginning of the performance period.
The Committee has historically exercised this downward discretion with respect to General RONA Bonuses awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and certain other executive officers. At the beginning of the year, the Committee determines for each of these executive officers a General RONA Bonus award opportunity that is large enough to ensure that we meet our objectives for annual cash incentive compensation and, at the same time, preserve the ability of the Committee to exercise its discretion to reduce the amount of the award payout to an appropriate level as compared to the final payouts made to executive officers who receive annual cash incentive compensation outside the Performance Bonus Plan and after taking into account individual performance and contributions to the success of our business. In addition, our calculation methodology for LTIP Award payouts also allows the Committee to exercise this discretion with respect to LTIP Award payouts.
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Our executive compensation program provides the Named Executive Officers with the elements of compensation described below. All of these elements are designed to contribute to our continuing effort to achievetop-quartile performance among our peers and encourage behavior that promotes long-term value creation for our shareholders within the framework of The Win Strategy.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 33 |
recognize experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership, leadership qualities, advancement, individual accomplishment and other significant contributions to the enhancement of shareholder value and the success of our business; and
attract, retain and motivate the highly-talented and values-driven individuals we need to advance the goals of The Win Strategy.
• | �� | attract, retain and motivate the highly-talented and values-driven individuals we need to advance the goals of The Win Strategy. |
The Committee establishes a base salary range for each Named Executive Officer by using Mercer’s annual review to analyze base salaries of persons holding comparable positions within the Peer Group companies. The Committee determines the base salary for each Named Executive Officer for the next fiscal year based on the Named Executive Officer’s annual performance review, and compares the amount to the applicable market range to make sure that it is reasonable. Among other matters, annual performance reviews and base salary adjustments consider performance and results aligned with The Win Strategy, including in certain of its ESG-related metrics such as, among others, team member safety, engagement and inclusion. The Committee may increase base salaries, where appropriate, periodically throughout the fiscal year based on the results of interim performance reviews. The Committee generally tries to target base salary amounts at approximately the median of the Peer Group companies. During
In fiscal year 2019,2021, no base salary increases were given over fiscal year 2020 to officers remaining in their same role year-over-year. As part of our Company-wide cost control measures related to the economic downturn and COVID-19, the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers were reduced beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020 and continued through the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 in the following amounts: by 50% for Mr. Williams; by 20% for Mr. Leombruno; by 30% for Mr. Banks; by 20% for Mr. Leonti; by 20% for Mr. Weeks; and by 25% for Ms. Suever. The table below reflects the base salary as approved by the Committee in August 2020, as well as the total base salary actually paid to each of the Named Executive Officers received the base salariesas of June 30, 2021, which is also included in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021.
Base Salaries | ||||
Named Executive Officers | FY2021 Base Salary($) | FY2021 Base Salary (Actual)($)(1) | ||
Thomas L. Williams | 1,325,000 | 1,159,375 | ||
Todd M. Leombruno(2) | 530,250 | 510,725 | ||
Lee C. Banks | 1,050,000 | 971,250 | ||
Joseph R. Leonti | 647,400 | 615,030 | ||
Andrew M. Weeks | 601,200 | 571,140 | ||
Catherine A. Suever(3) | 800,000 | 350,000 |
34 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(1) Base salaries were reduced in varying amounts between 20% and 50% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 as a result of economic downturn and ongoing COVID-19 cost control initiatives. (2) Mr. Leombruno was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2021. His annual base salary effective on that date was $670,000 and was $390,500 prior to his promotion. (3) Ms. Suever retired effective December 31, 2020. |
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
Our executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation based onpre-determined financial and growth objectives that are dependent on free cash flow margin, return on net assets and revenue growth. This category of compensation consists of three specific elements, which we refer to as Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses, and Converted RONA Bonuses. All of the Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses. As described beginning on page 39,37, Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier areWeeks is the only Named Executive OfficersOfficer whose General RONA Bonus is subject to the application of our Profitable Growth Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the PGI Plan.
The Committee allocates a significant portion of the total cash compensation for executive officers to annual cash incentive compensation, which is wholly dependent on achievingpre-determined financial and operational goals. At the beginning of fiscal year 2019,2021, Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses, at target, represented the following percentages of base salary for each of our Named Executive Officers:
Target Percentage of Base Salary | ||
Named Executive Officers | Target Incentive Bonuses General RONA Converted RONA Bonuses | |
Thomas L. Williams |
| |
Todd M. Leombruno(1) | 82% | |
Lee C. Banks | 108% | |
Joseph R. Leonti | 74% | |
Andrew M. Weeks | 74% | |
Catherine A. Suever | 92% |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(2) Because General RONA Bonuses are calculated based on actual base salary received during the fiscal year, the reductions in base salary in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 as a result of actions taken in response to COVID-19 had an impact on General RONA bonus payouts. |
The Committeepre-determines the performance measures applicable to each element by analyzing our annual goals and objectives for each performance measure and, for Target Incentive Bonuses, Mercer’s annual review. The Committee directly and materially links annual cash incentive compensation to performance that drives and supports The Win Strategy.
Target Incentive Bonuses
During fiscal year 2019,2021, the Named Executive Officers received annual cash incentive compensation based on our free cash flow margin, which we refer to as Target Incentive Bonuses. Free cash flow margin is calculated as the percentage of sales represented by actual operating cash flow less capital expenditures, excluding any discretionary pension contributions made during the fiscal year.
The Committee identified free cash flow margin as a performance measure critical to the profitable growth and financial performance goals of The Win Strategy. Maximizing free cash flow allows us to continue to pay annual dividends, strategically acquire our outstanding shares, and reinvest in our business by funding innovation and financing growth through acquisitions of businesses and technologies. Target Incentive Bonuses encourage executive officers to maximize free cash flow by increasing net income, implementing lean initiatives, controlling
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 35 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
inventory, collecting receivables, controlling accounts payable, and optimizing capital expenditures. We have also identified a strong correlation between increases in free cash flow and increases in operating earnings.
Target Incentive Bonuses are designed to directly reward executive officers for free cash flow margin performance against our annual plan and the performance of the Peer Group. Specifically, the Committee determines the target award opportunity for each of the executive officers and establishes the levels of performance for threshold, target and maximum payouts after evaluating our annual plan for free cash flow margin and theone-year, three-year and five-year average free cash flow margin within the Peer Group. Based on this data, the Committee estimated that 5.5%, 8.5%9% and 11.5%12.5% free cash flow margins would represent bottom-quartile, median andtop-quartile free cash flow margin results, respectively, within the Peer Group companies during fiscal year 2019.2021. After review and consideration of such data and our annual plan for free cash flow margin, the Committee increased the free cash flow top-quartile and median payout thresholds for our Target Incentive Bonuses infrom fiscal year 2019 from 5.0%2020 levels of 12% and 8.5%, respectively, to 5.5%9% and 12.5%, respectively, for a 50% payout, 8.0% to 8.5% for a 100% payout,fiscal year 2021, and 11% to 11.5% for a 200% payout.kept the bottom quartile threshold the same as fiscal year 2020 at 5.5%.
The following table illustrates how final fiscal year 20192021 Target Incentive Bonus amounts would be calculated:
FY19 Free Cash Flow Margin: | Less than 5.5% | 5.5% | 8.5% | Greater than or equal to 11.5% | ||||||||||||
FY21 Free Cash Flow Margin: | Less than 5.5% | 5.5% | 9% | Greater than or equal to 12.5% | ||||||||||||
Payout % | 0% | 50% | 100% | 200% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 200% |
This table illustrates that each recipient of a Target Incentive Bonus would receive ayear-end payout of 100% of his or her target award if our free cash flow margin for fiscal year 20192021 was 8.5%9.0% and a maximum payout of 200% of his or her target award if our free cash flow margin was greater than or equal to 11.5%12.5%, representingtop-quartile free cash flow margin. This table also illustrates that no Target Incentive Bonuses would be paid if our free cash flow margin for fiscal year 20192021 was less than 5.5%. The payout percentage that is applied is interpolated on a linear basis between the points in the above table.
In consideration of the foregoing, at the beginning of fiscal year 2019,2021, the Committee approved the following Target Incentive Bonuses in the table below for each of the Named Executive Officers:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Officers. Our actual free cash flow margin for fiscal year 20192021 was 12.12%16.48% (calculated by taking the difference of fiscal year 20192021 cash flow from operating activities of $1,730,140,000$2,575,001,000 less fiscal year 20192021 capital expenditures of $195,089,000, plus a $200,000,000 discretionary pension contribution,$209,957,000 and dividing the result by fiscal year 20192021 net sales of $14,320,324,000)$14,347,640,000). Accordingly, each of the Named Executive Officers received 200% of their Target Incentive Bonus award. These amounts are shown in the table below and are included in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021.
Named Executive Officer | Target Incentive Bonus ($) | Actual Target Incentive Bonus Amount ($) | ||
Thomas L. Williams | 927,500 | 1,855,000 | ||
Todd M. Leombruno(1) | 173,050 | 346,100 | ||
Lee C. Banks | 472,500 | 945,000 | ||
Joseph R. Leonti | 194,200 | 388,400 | ||
Andrew M. Weeks | 150,300 | 300,600 | ||
Catherine A. Suever(2) | 160,000 | 320,000 |
(1) Mr. Leombruno’s Target Incentive Bonus award was set at $78,100 at the beginning of fiscal year 2021, with an adjusted Target Incentive Bonus award of $268,000, effective January 1, 2021 due to his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Leombruno’s pro-rata target award was $173,500 for fiscal year 2021. (2) Ms. Suever retired effective December 31, 2020. |
Target Incentive Bonuses are paid in one lump sum in August for each executive officer whose Target Incentive Bonus is awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan, and are paid in three installments in March, June and August for all other executive officers. The March and June payments are estimated based onyear-to-date results, and the August payment represents the balance of the Target Incentive Bonus payable based on the actual results for the entire fiscal year. We generally hold back 25% of theyear-to-date estimate from each March and
36 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
June payment to ensure that we have the flexibility to reconcile the August payments to finalyear-end results. All payments are made in cash, except that the August payment may, at the election of the recipient, be deferred as a credit to the recipient’s account under the Executive Deferral Plan, which we describe in the section,“Non-Qualified Benefit Plans”.
General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses
During fiscal year 2019,2021, each of the Named Executive Officers was eligible for, and received, annual cash incentive compensation based on our return on net assets, which we refer to as General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses. The Committee awards General RONA Bonuses to our executive officers to encourage and reward performance which maximizes our returns on net assets. The Committee awards Converted RONA Bonuses to our executive officers in place of certain executive perquisites.
The performance measures used to determine payouts on General RONA Bonuses are as follows:
for executive officers who receive General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan, return on consolidated net assets;
for executive officers who are operating group presidents and do not receive General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan or who are not Executive Vice Presidents, return on average division net assets for divisions in the applicable operating group; and
for all other executive officers, return on average net assets for all divisions.
The performance measure used to determine the amount of the payouts on Converted RONA Bonuses is the return on average net assets for all of our divisions.
Return on net assets is calculated by dividing earnings(year-to-date segment operating income) by average assets (average of inventory, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangibles, less trade accounts payable and contract reserves,reserves), at the beginning of the fiscal year and at the end of each applicable quarter.
The Committee identified return on net assets as a performance measure critical to the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy. The Committee uses General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses to encourage executive officers and other employeesteam members to increase segment operating income and control net average assets by reducing investments in assets and increasing efficiency in managing those investments. In addition, General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses encourage executive officers and other employeesteam members to increase sales and to reduce operating expenses and other costs associated with managing our working capital and investments. The Committee also believes that offering Converted RONA Bonuses in lieu of certain eliminated executive perquisites is appropriate to keep us competitive in attracting, retaining, and motivating present and future executive officers and to hold our executive officers accountable for results.
General RONA Bonuses awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan are paid in one lump sum in August. General RONA Bonuses awarded outside the Performance Bonus Plan and Converted RONA Bonuses, which are not awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan, are paid in four installments in October, January, April and August. Each installment is based on actualyear-to-date results. We generally hold back 25% of theyear-end estimate from each October, January and April installment to ensure that we have the flexibility to reconcile the August payments with finalyear-end results. All payments are made in cash, except that General RONA Bonus payments made in August may, at the election of the recipient, be deferred as a credit to the recipient’s Executive Deferral Plan account.
The Committee determines and calculates General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses as follows:
• | Setting Target |
• | Converting Target Amounts to “RONA shares”: Once determined, the target amounts set for General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses are converted into a number of “RONA shares” based |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 37 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
on our annual goals for return on net assets. In fiscal year |
• | Determining the Actual |
• | Calculating the Actual RONA |
The following tables show each of the Named Executive Officers’ General RONA Bonus and Converted RONA Bonus target amounts, “shares”, “multiples” and actual amounts.
General RONA Bonuses | General RONA Bonuses | General RONA Bonuses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Base Salary | Target General RONA Bonus Amount | General RONA Bonus “Shares” | General RONA Bonus “Multiple” | Actual General RONA Bonus Amount | Base Salary Earned(1) | Target General RONA Bonus Amount | Target General RONA Bonus “Shares” | General RONA Bonus “Multiple” | Actual General RONA Bonus Amount | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | $1,250,000 | $1,062,500 | 17 | 6.68% | $1,419,500 | $ | 1,159,375 | $ | 1,126,250 | 17 | 6.90% | $ | 1,359,947 | |||||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno(2) | 510,725 | 209,325 | 7.97 | 6.90% | 280,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 971,250 | 577,500 | 11 | 6.90% | 737,179 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti(3) | 615,030 | 226,520 | 7 | 6.90% | 497,059 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks(4) | 571,140 | 240,480 | 8 | 8.91% | 407,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | $ 750,800 | $ 337,860 | 9 | 6.68% | $ 451,381 | 350,000 | 360,000 | 9 | 6.90% | 217,350 | ||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | $1,000,000 | $ 550,000 | 11 | 6.68% | $ 734,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone(1) | $ 605,000 | $ 242,000 | 8 | 6.81% | $ 329,604 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier(2)(3) | $ 551,458 | $ 220,583 | 8 | 6.70% | $ 295,581 |
(1) | Reflects reductions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 in connection with cost reduction actions associated with the economic downturn and our COVID-19 response. |
(2) | Mr. Leombruno’s Target General RONA Bonus was increased by 15%, from 30% to 45%, as a result of his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2021, and his target General RONA Bonus shares were increased to 9 shares. The amounts in the table above reflect Mr. Leombruno’s pro-rata RONA Bonus for fiscal year 2021. |
(3) | As detailed below, the Committee determined to exercise less negative reduction with respect to Mr. Leonti’s General RONA Bonus in recognition of his significant contributions to the success of the Company’s growth initiatives under The Win Strategy in fiscal year 2021. |
(4) | In fiscal year |
| ||
38 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Converted RONA Bonuses | ||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Target Converted RONA Bonus Amount | Converted RONA Bonus “Shares” | Converted RONA Bonus “Multiple” | Actual Converted RONA Bonus Amount | ||||
Thomas L. Williams | $80,490 | 1.19 | 6.90% | $111,076 | ||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 54,175 | 1.48(1) | 6.90% | 74,762 | ||||
Lee C. Banks | 80,060 | 1.69 | 6.90% | 110,483 | ||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 55,040 | 1.86 | 6.90% | 75,955 | ||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 55,040 | 1.86 | 6.90% | 75,955 | ||||
Catherine A. Suever | 55,220 | 1.48 | 6.90% | 35,837 |
(1) |
|
Converted RONA Bonuses | ||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Target Converted RONA Bonus Amount | Converted RONA Bonus “Shares” | Converted RONA Bonus “Multiple” | Actual Converted RONA Bonus Amount | ||||
Thomas L. Williams | $78,140 | 1.19 | 6.68% | $104,395 | ||||
Catherine A. Suever | $53,610 | 1.48 | 6.68% | $ 71,623 | ||||
Lee C. Banks | $77,720 | 1.69 | 6.68% | $103,834 | ||||
Robert W. Malone | $53,440 | 1.86 | 6.68% | $ 71,396 | ||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | $53,341 | 1.86 | 6.68% | $ 71,263 |
Each of the Named Executive Officers received the General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses included in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021. In arriving at these amounts, the Committee compared the original target award opportunities for executive officers receiving General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan (including each of the Named Executive Officers other than Ms. Parmentier)except Mr. Leombruno) with the final payout amounts of annual cash incentive compensation for the other executive officers, and evaluated the individual performance and contributions to the success of our business of the executive officers receiving General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan. Based on that comparison and evaluation, the Committee determined that it would be appropriate to exercise downward discretion and reduce the final General RONA Bonus payout amounts for General RONA Bonuses awarded to the Named Executive Officers under the Performance Bonus Plan by approximately 35%50.4% (except in Mr. Leonti’s case, the Committee determined to reduce his payout amount by approximately 16.9% in recognition of his significant contributions to the success of the Company’s growth initiatives under The Win Strategy in fiscal year 2021). The amounts reported in the tablesGeneral RONA Bonuses table above represent the final amounts paid to the Named Executive Officers following that exercisethose exercises of discretion.
Converted RONA Bonus payments are not eligible for deferral under the Executive Deferral Plan, the Retirement Savings Plan, or the Savings Restoration Plan. Converted RONA Bonuses are also not considered in calculating benefits under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan, the Supplemental Retirement Program, the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan, and the Change in Control Agreements. The Committee determined that it would not be appropriate to allow Converted RONA Bonuses to be deferred under those plans or considered in those calculations because they are intended to replace executive perquisites which, historically, were not used or taken into account for those purposes.
Profitable Growth Incentive Plan
Our PGI Plan is designed to implement the strategies and advance the goals of The Win Strategy by encouraging and rewarding participants for sales growth, organically and through acquisitions at the operating group or division level. The Committee identified sales growth, organically and through acquisitions, as a performance measure critical to advance the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy. Under our PGI Plan, the General RONA Bonuses for participants may be adjusted after each fiscal year on the basis of a multiplier, which we refer to as the PG RONA Multiplier, that is determined by the three-year compound annual growth rate of external customer sales for the applicable operating group or division, which we refer to as3-year CAGR. The following
table sets forth examples of the PG RONA Multiplier that may be applied to, and which may increase or decrease, the General RONA Bonuses under our PGI Plan after each fiscal year:
3-year CAGR: | Less than or equal to -5% | 3%-5% | 8% | Greater than or equal to 15% | ||||
PG RONA Multiplier: | 90% | 100% | 105% | 130% |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 39 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
3-year CAGR: | Less than or equal to -5% | 3%-5% | 8% | Greater than or equal to 15% | ||||
PG RONA Multiplier: | 90% | 100% | 105% | 130% |
The PG RONA Multiplier is interpolated on a linear basis between the points in the above table. Of our executive officers, only our operating group presidents’ General RONA Bonuses are subject to our PGI Plan, and, therefore, the PGI Plan applies to Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier,Weeks, but not to any of our other Named Executive Officers. During fiscal year 2019,2021, the three-year CAGR applicable to: Mr. Malone’sWeeks’ General RONA Bonus was 29.30%17.52%, resulting in a PG RONA Multiplier of 130%; and to Ms. Parmentier’s General RONA Bonus was 6.17%, resulting in a. This PG RONA Multiplier of 102%. These PG RONA Multipliers werewas applied to Mr. Malone’s and Ms. Parmentier’sWeeks’ final RONA BonusesBonus causing the increase from a 5.24%6.86% General RONA Bonus multiple to 6.81%8.91% for Mr. Malone, and the increase from a 6.58% General RONA Bonus multiple to 6.70% for Ms. Parmentier,Weeks, as reflected in the General RONA Bonuses charttable above.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The Named Executive Officers receive long-term incentive compensation consisting of long-term incentive performance awards, which we refer to as LTIP Awards, and stock appreciation rights, which we refer to as Stock Incentives. The target amounts of LTIP Awards and the number of Stock Incentives awarded to the Named Executive Officers are based on similar compensation awarded to persons holding comparable positions within the Peer Group companies. In fiscal year 2019, the Committee also granted Messrs. Banks and Malone and Ms. Parmentier restricted stock units for retention purposes and in recognition of their extraordinary contributions to our success in furtherance of The Win Strategy.
LTIP Awards and Stock Incentives encourage long-term focus on shareholder value and are directly and materially linked to performance that advances both the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy over the long-term. LTIP Award payouts are based on a comparison of our performance against the Peer Group companies in certain key financial metrics over a three-year performance period. The holders of Stock Incentives realize a payout only if our stock price increases above the applicable grant price over a three-yearpro-rata vesting period. LTIP Awards and Stock Incentives work together to align the long-term financial interests of our executive officers and shareholders.
LTIP Awards are granted to eligible employees on an annual basis at the January meeting of the Committee. This meeting is typically scheduled at least one year in advance. The only exceptions to this practice are thatpro-rated prorated LTIP Awards are granted to individuals who become executive officers, are promoted to new executive officer positions, or are given increased responsibilities during a performance period.
Stock Incentives are granted to eligible employeesteam members on an annual basis at the August meeting of the Committee. This meeting is typically scheduled at least one year in advance.
The Committee does not grant LTIP Awards or Stock Incentives to executive officers in anticipation of the release of significant positive earnings announcements or other materialnon-public information likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock. Similarly, the Committee does not time the release of materialnon-public information based on Stock Incentive grant dates.
LTIP Awards
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Committee adopted a Long-Term Incentive Performance Plan under the Performance Bonus Plan, which we refer to as the Officer LTIP Plan, to
establish the terms and conditions for LTIP Awards granted to our executive officers during and after fiscal year 2011. In fiscal year 2019, after review of benchmarking surveys conducted by Mercer, the Committee approved certain changes to the Officer LTIP Plan to more closely align certain aspects of the LTIP awards with market and Peer Group compensation practices. The changes were effective for the fiscal year 2019 LTIP awards and are as follows:
|
|
|
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2019,2021, the Committee granted to each of the Named Executive Officers, under ourthe terms of the Officer LTIP Plan and our Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Amended 2016 Equity Plan, the following target LTIP AwardsAward values for the calendar year 2021-22-23 performance period based on the following target LTIP Award values:values for the calendar year 2021-22-23 performance period:
Named Executive Officer | Target LTIP Award Shares | Target LTIP Award Values | ||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 32,670 | $5,000,000 | ||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 8,820 | $1,350,000 | ||||||
Lee C. Banks | 14,700 | $2,250,000 | ||||||
Robert W. Malone | 3,920 | $ 600,000 | ||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier* | 2,660 | $ 407,500 |
40 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Named Executive Officer |
Target LTIP Award Shares |
Target LTIP Award Values ($) | ||
Thomas L. Williams | 19,388 | 5,250,000 | ||
Todd M. Leombruno(1) | 5,536 | 1,500,000 | ||
Lee C. Banks | 8,856 | 2,400,000 | ||
Joseph R. Leonti | 2,587 | 700,000 | ||
Andrew M. Weeks | 2,587 | 700,000 | ||
Catherine A. Suever(2) | — | — |
(1) |
|
(2) | Ms. Suever retired effective December 31, 2020 and did not receive LTIP awards in |
The target LTIP Award shares shown in this table (along with the awarded dividend equivalent units applicable to the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212021-22-23 performance period) are also included in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards—Target” column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192021 table. The “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192021 includes the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards in fiscal year 2019.2021.
Under the Officer LTIP Plan, the actual payouts for these LTIP Awards will be calculated following the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2021,2023, as follows:
The Committee will first determine if, during the performance period, we achieved an average return on average equity of 4% or an average free cash flow margin of 4%.
If at least one of these threshold performance measures above are not achieved, participants will not receive a payout.
If at least one of these threshold performance measures above are achieved, participants will become eligible to receive the maximum payout of 200% of the applicable target LTIP Award value. The Committee will then, if appropriate, apply its discretion to reduce the final payouts based on any performance measures that the Committee determines to be appropriate. The Committee determined that this calculation methodology would provide the Committee with more flexibility to ensure payout levels are as accurately reflective of the Company’s performance against the Peer Group as possible and are otherwise in the best interests of our business and our shareholders.
To provide the Committee with guidelines for exercising its discretion, the Officer LTIP Plan provides that the Committee may, among other things, following the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212021-22-23 performance period compare our revenue growth, growth in fully diluted earnings per share from continuing operations and average return on invested capital from continuing operations against the corresponding results of the Peer Group companies during their three most recent fiscal years. The Committee has identified long-term revenue growth, earnings per share growth and return on invested capital as performance measures critical to the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy because, among other things, they encourage our executive officers to provideon-time delivery of quality products, value-added services and systems, strategic supply chain, lean enterprise, value pricing, market-driven innovation and strong distribution.
Specifically, the Officer LTIP Plan provides for using weights of 20% for revenue growth, 40% for growth in fully diluted earnings per share from continuing operations, and 40% for average return on invested capital from continuing operations for the applicable performance periods, and the following table to calculate final LTIP Award payouts:
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 41 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Peer Group Percentile Rank: | Less than 35th | 35th | 50th | 75th or higher | ||||
Payout% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 200% |
At the end of calendar year 2021,2023, if we achieve an average return on average equity or an average free cash flow margin of 4% or greater, the Committee may exercise discretion in determining the appropriate payout by determining our percentile rank as compared to the Peer Group for each of the three performance measures. Using this table, the Committee will calculate the portion of the target LTIP Award value earned with respect to each performance measure. The Committee will multiply each portion by its applicable weight and add up the total to determine the total LTIP Award payout for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212021-22-23 performance period. This table illustrates that recipients of LTIP Awards granted during calendar year 20192021 will receive the maximum payout of 200% of the applicable target LTIP Award value if we rank at or above the 75th percentile among the Peer Group companies in the aggregate based on all three performance measures, and will receive no payout if we rank at or below the 35th percentile in the aggregate based on all three performance measures. The payout percentage that is applied is interpolated on a linear basis between the points in the above table.
LTIP Award payouts for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212021-22-23 performance period may only be paid after the end of the applicable three-year performance period in unrestricted shares of our common stock.
The Committee designed these LTIP Awards to reward executive officers directly in relation to our long-term performance against the Peer Group. The Committee determined that requiring performance in excess of the 50th percentile for a payout in excess of 100% would encourage executive officers to achieve performance above median Peer Group performance. The Committee also determined that requiring performance at the 75th percentile for a maximum payout, and awarding no payout for performance at or below the 35th percentile, would further encourage executive officers to achievetop-quartile performance within the Peer Group companies.
In addition, each of the Named Executive Officers received a payout under LTIP Awards granted during the third quarter of fiscal year 20162018 for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2018.2020. We exceeded our threshold performance measures with an average return on average equity for the three-year performance period of 20.4%22.9% and average free cash flow margin for the three-year performance period of 10.4%14%. The Committee decided to exercise discretion to determine the appropriate payout and determined that we achieved the following percentile rankings among the Peer Group companies with respect to the LTIP Award performance measures for the calendar yearyears 2016-17-182018-19-20 performance period:
Performance Measure | Result | Percentile Rank | Weighted Payout Percentage | |||||||
Revenue growth |
| 22.19% |
| 88th |
| 200.00 | % | |||
Growth in fully diluted EPS |
| 73.89% |
| 76th |
| 200.00 | % | |||
Average return on invested capital |
| 18.20% |
| 65th |
| 158.80 | % |
Performance Measure | Result | Percentile Rank | Weighted Payout Percentage | |||
Revenue Growth (20%) | 1.16% | 78th | 40% | |||
Earnings Per Share Growth (40%) | 36.14% | 67th | 66.66% | |||
Average Return on Invested Capital (40%) | 15.46% | 72nd | 75.56% |
As a result, each of the Named Executive Officers received the LTIP Award payout during fiscal year 20192021 included in the “Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting” column of the Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 20192021 table. Each payment represents a total payout of 183.52%182.21% of the target LTIP Award values for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2018.2020.
Stock Incentives
Each of the Named Executive Officers received Stock Incentives under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019.2021. The Committee grants Stock Incentives to executive officers to encourage and reward efforts and accomplishments that advance the goals of The Win Strategy and make other contributions to maximize long-term shareholder value.
The number of Stock Incentives granted by the Committee is determined by utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model to convert a target dollar value into the number of Stock Incentives to be granted. The Committee uses Mercer’s annual review to ensure the target dollar values are reasonable in relation to the median of similar compensation offered within the companies included in Mercer’s annual review. The following table shows the Target Value and the number of Stock Incentives granted to each of the Named Executive Officers in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019:2021:
Named Executive Officer | Target Value | Stock Incentive Grants (# of Underlying Shares) | ||||
Thomas L. Williams | $5,000,000 |
| 81,180 |
| ||
Catherine A. Suever | $1,350,000 |
| 21,920 |
| ||
Lee C. Banks | $2,250,000 |
| 36,530 |
| ||
Robert W. Malone | $ 600,000 |
| 9,740 |
| ||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | $ 407,500 |
| 6,620 |
|
42 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Named Executive Officer | Target Value | Stock Incentive Grants (# of Underlying Shares) | ||
Thomas L. Williams | $5,250,000 | 76,690 | ||
Todd M. Leombruno(1) | $250,000 | 3,650 | ||
Lee C. Banks | $2,400,000 | 35,060 | ||
Joseph R. Leonti | $700,000 | 10,220 | ||
Andrew M. Weeks | $700,000 | 10,220 | ||
Catherine A. Suever | $1,500,000 | 21,910 |
(1) | As set in line with Mr. Leombruno’s previous role of Vice President and Controller on the date of the award. |
The fiscal year 20192021 Stock Incentive grants shown above are also included in the “All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options” column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192021 table and the “Option Awards—Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options—Unexercisable” column of the Outstanding Equity Awards at June 30, 20192021 table. The “Option Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192021 includes the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards in fiscal year 2019.2021.
As required by the terms of our Amended 2016 Equity Plan, these fiscal year 20192021 Stock Incentives have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The plan does not permit there-pricing repricing of Stock Incentives. The Committee analyzed the terms of our Amended 2016 Equity Plan and considered Mercer’s annual review to establish all other terms of these Stock Incentives. These fiscal year 20192021 Stock Incentives have aten-year term and vest inone-third increments over three years following the grant date. When vested, each Stock Incentive will entitle the holder to receive the increase in value of one common share from the grant date to the date of exercise.
Upon exercise of fiscal year 20192021 Stock Incentives, common shares will be issued directly to the holder. The appreciation in these Stock Incentives will be calculated by subtracting the grant price from the fair market value of the common shares at exercise, and multiplying the result by the number of Stock Incentives exercised. The number of common shares to be issued is determined by dividing that appreciation by the market price of the common shares at exercise.
During fiscal year 2019, none of the Named Executive Officers exercised Stock Incentives previously granted under our 2016 Equity Plan, 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and 2003 Stock Incentive Plan.
Restricted Stock Units
During fiscal year 2019, the Committee granted retention and recognition awards of restricted stock units, which we refer to as RSUs, to the following Named Executive Officers for retention purposes and in recognition of their significant performance and contributions to the execution of the goals of The Win Strategy:
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock. The RSUs will vest in full on the applicable vesting date identified above, provided that the Named Executive Officer remains an active full-time employee throughout the vesting period. If the Named Executive Officer ceases to be employed by us for any reason, other than death, disability or a Change in Control as defined beginning on page 68, she or he will forfeit the entire award. In the event of the Named Executive Officer’s death, disability or a Change in Control prior to the applicable vesting date, the RSUs will vest immediately. Upon the applicable vesting date, the RSUs will be paid to the Named Executive Officer or her or his estate in shares of our common stock. The Named Executive Officer does not receive dividends nor does she or he have voting rights in the common shares underlying the RSUs, however, she or he does receive dividend equivalents.
The above described RSUs are included in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards—Target” column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2019 table. The “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019 includes the aggregate grant date fair value of this award in fiscal year 2019.
The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in various employee benefit plans and programs. These plans and programs reward experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership and advancement. We use these plans to ensure that our executive compensation program remains sufficiently competitive to attract, retain and motivate the executive officers and other employeesteam members necessary to advance the goals of The Win Strategy.
Qualified Benefit Plans
During fiscal year 2019,2021, the Named Executive Officers participated in the followingtax-qualified benefit plans and programs:
The Parker-Hannifin Consolidated Pension Plan, which we refer to as the Pension Plan, except for Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leonti and Ms. ParmentierWeeks who are not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan; and
The Parker Retirement Savings Plan, which we refer to as the Retirement Savings Plan.
The Pension Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan in which most full-timenon-union U.S. salaried employees hired prior to April 1, 2004, participate. The Pension Plan offers normal retirement, early retirement and death benefits. The monthly normal retirement benefit is the greater of a minimum benefit and an amount based on final average pay. The minimum benefit and final average pay amounts are calculated as follows:
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 43 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Minimum Benefit: |
| |
Final Average Pay Amount: |
|
The amount of the benefit is reduced by 6% per year for each year prior to age 65 if retirement occurs and payments commence before age 65 and after age 55. We elected to freeze new participation in the Pension Plan in 2004. All participants as of April 1, 2004, were given the option to either remain in the Pension Plan or terminate in favor of maintaining a retirement income account under the Retirement Savings Plan. Employees hired after April 1, 2004, including Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leonti and Ms. Parmentier,Weeks, were not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan and instead maintain a retirement income account under the Retirement Savings Plan. Each of the Named Executive Officers who are in the Pension Plan elected to remain in and continue to accrue benefits under the Pension Plan. All benefits accrued by employeesteam members who elected to terminate participation in the Pension Plan were frozen as of June 30, 2004. Those employeesteam members initiated their retirement income accounts on July 1, 2004.
The Retirement Savings Plan is a qualified defined contribution pension plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Most full-time U.S. employeesteam members are eligible to participate in the Retirement Savings Plan. Participants may makepre-tax andpost-tax contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan up to the applicable statutory limit. Converted RONA Bonuses are not eligible for deferral under the Retirement Savings Plan. We provide to each participant a matching contribution of 100% on the first 3% of pay contributed and 50% on the 4th and 5th percent of pay contributed on apre-tax basis or Roth basis. As described above, certain participants also maintain a retirement income account within the Retirement Savings Plan. We provide to each holder of a retirement income account an annual contribution equal to a percentage of the amount of the participant’s annual compensation
up to the Internal Revenue Service statutory limit (currently $280,000$285,000 per year), based on age and length of service. These contributions range from 0.5% to 6% of the participant’s compensation which does not exceed that limit. Participants accrue earnings on contributions based on the performance of various investment funds available within the Retirement Savings Plan. The contributions made by us under the Retirement Savings Plan for the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192021 on page 54.52.
Non-Qualified Benefit Plans
During fiscal year 2019,2021, the Named Executive Officers participated in the followingnon-qualified benefit plans and programs:
The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Savings Restoration Plan, which we refer to as the Savings Restoration Plan;
The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Executive Deferral Plan, which we refer to as the Executive Deferral Plan, except for Mr. Malone and Ms. ParmentierWeeks who dodoes not participate in the Executive Deferral Plan;
The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Pension Restoration Plan, which we refer to as the Pension Restoration Plan, except for Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leonti and Ms. ParmentierWeeks who are not eligible to participate in the Pension Restoration Plan as they are not participants in the Pension Plan;
The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits Program, which we refer to as the Supplemental Retirement Program, except for Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leonti and Ms. ParmentierWeeks who are not eligible to participate in the Supplemental Retirement Program; and
44 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Program, which we refer to as the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program (Mr. Malone(Messrs. Leonti and Ms. ParmentierWeeks are the only Named Executive Officers who participate in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program).
The Savings Restoration Plan is available to employeesteam members who earn base salaries equal to or in excess of $150,000 per year and who are otherwise eligible to participate in the plan. The Savings Restoration Plan was established to restore deferral opportunities and matching contributions lost because of statutory limits in the Retirement Savings Plan. Specifically, the Savings Restoration Plan allows executive officers to defer a portion of theirpre-tax compensation and receive matching contributions from us that would have been available under the Retirement Savings Plan if the Internal Revenue Service statutory limit did not exist. Converted RONA Bonuses are not eligible for deferral under the Savings Restoration Plan. Each Named Executive Officer may annually defer to his or her Savings Restoration Plan account any portion of the compensation that he or she cannot defer under the Retirement Savings Plan due to the statutory limit, other than Converted RONA Bonuses, up to the greater of 20% of base pay or $25,000. We provide to each participant a matching contribution of common stock equal to 100% on the first 3% of pay contributed and 50% on the 4th and 5th percent of pay contributed, reduced by the maximum matching contribution available to the participant under the Retirement Savings Plan. We also take into account the matching contributions made under the Retirement Savings Plan to ensure that the maximum match under both plans does not exceed $17,000. In addition, all participants who maintain a retirement income account within the Retirement Savings Plan also maintain a separate retirement income account within the Savings Restoration Plan. We provide to each holder of a retirement income account an annual contribution equal to a percentage of the amount of the participant’s annual compensation in excess of the Internal Revenue
Service statutory limit determined based on age and length of service. These contributions range from 0.5% to 6% of the amount of the participant’s compensation in excess of that limit. All deferrals and contributions are made under the Savings Restoration Plan by accounting entry rather than any physical exchange of cash or common stock. Participants also accrue earnings, on an accounting-entry basis, on deferrals based on the performance of various investment fund choices and on contributions based on the performance of our common stock. Participants are our unsecured creditors for their respective account balances.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 45 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Savings Restoration Plan and Executive Deferral Plan account balances are paid out upon any of the following events as follows:
Retirement: | Balances are distributed to the participant in either a lump sum or in periodic installments, based on a prior election by the participant. The participant can delay the commencement of payments up to five years following retirement. Balances continue to accumulate earnings under the various investment funds at all times during the payout period. | |
Termination Before Retirement: | Balances accruing on or prior to December 31, 2004 are, at our election, distributed to the participant in either a lump sum upon termination or in periodic installments. Account balances accruing on or after January 1, 2005 are distributed to the participant in a lump sum upon termination. | |
Disability: | If we determine that a participant is totally disabled, the participant’s account balance will be paid upon termination in the same manner as if he or she retired. | |
Withdrawals During Employment: | Balances can be withdrawn without penalty during employment only if we determine that the participant suffered severe financial hardship. Balances accruing on or prior to December 31, 2004 can also be withdrawn voluntarily during employment, subject to a 10% forfeiture penalty. | |
Death: | Balances are distributed to the participant’s beneficiary in a lump sum or, if elected by the participant, in installments. | |
Change in Control: | Under the Savings Restoration Plan, balances accruing on or prior to December 31, 2004 are distributed to the participant in a lump sum without penalty if the participant expressly elected a lump sum. If the participant did not expressly elect a lump sum, distributions are treated as unscheduled withdrawals and are subject to a forfeiture penalty of 5% if they are withdrawn within 30 days or 10% if they are withdrawn beyond the30-day period. Balances accruing on or after January 1, 2005 are distributed to the participant in a lump sum. Under the Executive Deferral Plan, balances are distributed to the participant in a lump sum. |
Our matching contributions made under the Savings Restoration Plan for the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021. All contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Savings Restoration Plan during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192021 table.
The Executive Deferral Plan is available to executive officers and certain other key employees.team members. The Executive Deferral Plan provides executive officers with an opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation (in addition to that deferred under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Savings
Restoration Plan) on apre-tax basis, including Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses, and to accumulatetax-deferred earnings on the deferrals. LTIP Award payouts and Converted RONA Bonuses are not eligible for deferral under the Executive Deferral Plan. Each executive may defer to his or her account up to 80% of base salary and 80% of General RONA Bonuses paid in August and Target Incentive Bonuses paid in August. Similar to the Savings Restoration Plan, all deferrals are made under the Executive Deferral Plan by accounting entry rather than any physical exchange of cash. Participants also accrue earnings on an accounting-entry basis based on the performance of various investment fund choices. Participants are our unsecured creditors for their respective account balances. Account balances in the Executive Deferral Plan are paid as indicated in the charttable below. For those who were participants in the Executive Deferral Plan prior to January 1, 2016, prior to distribution, the balances are increased to reflect any“gross-up” amount necessary to offset federal excise taxes and anyafter-tax value the participant would have
46 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
received if the account had remained in place and been paid as elected by the participant. Any balances on distribution to a participant in the Executive Deferral Plan who becomes a participant on or after January 1, 2016, are no longer increased to reflect any“gross-up” amount to offset federal excise taxes and anyafter-tax value the participant would have received if the account had remained in place and been paid as elected by the participant. All contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Executive Deferral Plan during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192021 table.
The Pension Restoration Plan is available to all individuals who participate in the Pension Plan and who are otherwise eligible to participate in the Pension Restoration Plan. The Pension Restoration Plan was established to restore benefits lost because of statutory limits on the Pension Plan. Specifically, the benefits available under the Pension Restoration Plan equal the amount that would be payable to the participant under the Pension Plan in excess of the Internal Revenue Service statutory limit if that limit did not exist and the participant had not elected to defer any compensation under the Savings Restoration Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan. Similar to the Pension Plan, Converted RONA Bonuses are not considered in calculating the benefits available under the Pension Restoration Plan.
The Supplemental Retirement Program was established to provide executive officers with retirement benefits supplemental to the benefits under the Pension Plan. The benefit provided under the Supplemental Retirement Program is intended, at age 65, to provide to participants with at least 15 years of service 55% of the average of the three highest years of base salary plus annual cash incentive compensation. Similar to the Pension Plan and the Pension Restoration Plan, Converted RONA Bonuses are not considered in calculating the benefits available under the Supplemental Retirement Program. LTIP Awards and Stock Incentives are also not considered in calculating the benefits available under the Supplemental Retirement Program. The benefit is subject to reduction for early retirement, less than 15 years of service, benefits under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and any of ournon-U.S. pension plans, 50% of primary social security benefits and 100% of any similarnon-U.S. state-provided retirement benefits, and contributions to the participant’s retirement income accounts under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Savings Restoration Plan. Participants vest at age 60, or at age 55 with the consent of the Committee, and with five years of participation in the Supplemental Retirement Program, or a lesser period established by the Committee at the time they become participants. To receive a benefit under the Supplemental Retirement Program, however, a vested participant must have at least five years of service. In January 2015, the Committee closed the Supplemental Retirement Program to new participants as of July 1, 2014.
The Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program was established to provide executive officers and certain other key management employeesteam members with retirement benefits supplemental to the benefits under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Savings Restoration Plan. The Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program was established to replace the Supplemental Retirement Program for executive officers who are designated as participants on or after July 1, 2014.
Depending on a participant’s salary grade on December 31 of each year, we provide an annualnon-discretionary employer contribution of 8%, 10% or 12% of a participant’s base salary, Target Incentive Bonus and General RONA Bonus that was paid during the calendar year. The Committee may determine to make an additional annual discretionary contribution to a designated participant’s account. Participants vest at age 60, or at age 55 with the consent of the Committee, and with five years of participation in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, or a lesser period established by the Committee at the time they become participants. To receive a benefit under the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, however, a vested participant must have at least five years of service. Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leonti and Ms. ParmentierWeeks are our only Named Executive Officers who participate in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program.
Our contributions made under the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program for Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leonti and Ms. ParmentierWeeks during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021. All contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192021 table.
Health and Welfare Benefits
The Named Executive Officers participated in various health and welfare programs generally available to all employeesteam members during fiscal year 2019.2021. The Named Executive Officers also participated in our Officer Life Insurance Plan and our Executive Long-Term Disability Plan.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 47 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Under the Officer Life Insurance Plan, we pay all required premiums for life insurance on executive officers who were participants prior to January 1, 2008 (which includes Named Executive Officers Messrs. Williams and Banks) for the longer of 10 years or until the executive officer reaches age 65. For those executive officers who were participants after January 1, 2008 (which includes Named Executive Officers Mses. SueverMessrs. Leombruno, Leonti and ParmentierWeeks and Mr. Malone)Ms. Suever) we pay all required premiums for life insurance until retirement up to age 65. The premiums are designed to maintain death benefits equal to:
five times base salary during employment and two times final base salary after retirement at age 65 for our Chief Executive Officer;
four times base salary during employment and two times final base salary after retirement at age 65 for our Chief Financial Officer, and our President and our Chief Operating Officer; and
three times base salary during employment and two times final base salary after retirement at age 65 for all other Named Executive Officers and other participants.
If the participant retires between ages 55 and 65, the post-retirement death benefit is reduced by 10% of base salary for each year prior to age 65 that the participant retires. The amount of the death benefit is adjusted each year on January 1st based on the participant’s base salary as of the preceding December 1st. The policies underlying the plan are cash value life insurance policies owned by the participants. The premiums we paid on behalf of the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 20192021 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021.
The Executive Long-Term Disability Plan is intended to replace a reasonable amount of an executive officer’s income upon disability. The plan provides a total benefit in the event of a qualifying disability oftwo-thirds of base salary plus Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses (after applying the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable) paid during the calendar year ending December 31 of
the year prior to the disability, up to a maximum monthly benefit, in the case of Messrs. Williams and Banks and Ms. Suever, of $33,000, or, in the case of Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leombruno, Leonti and Ms. Parmentier,Weeks, of $35,000. Our executive officers are not eligible to receive the long-term disability benefit generally available to other employees.team members.
Change in Control Agreements
We are not a party to any written employment agreements with our executive officers. We have, however, entered into separate Change in Control Severance Agreements with our executive officers, which we refer to as the Change in Control Agreements. We are not obligated to pay severance to executive officers under any agreement other than the Change in Control Agreements. The executive officers are, however, eligible to receive severance upon termination for reasons other than a change in control in accordance with our general severance policy for salaried employees. The Change in Control Agreements are designed to attract, retain and motivate executive officers, provide for stability and continuity of management in the event of any actual or threatened change in control, encourage executive officers to remain in service after a change in control and ensure that executive officers are able to devote their entire attention to maximizing shareholder value and safeguarding employeeteam member interests in the event of a change in control. The Committee determined that the amounts payable under the Change in Control Agreements are reasonable and necessary to achieve those objectives. The Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control at June 30, 2019,2021, tables and the related narrative descriptions provide additional information on the Change in Control Agreements, including a brief discussion of the material provisions of the Change in Control Agreements under the captions “Payments upon a Change in Control” and “Payments upon a Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control.”
Indemnification Agreements
We enter into separate Indemnification Agreements with each of our executive officers. Each agreement remains in effect during and after employment with respect to any action taken while the individual serves as an executive officer. The agreements are designed to attract, retain and motivate executive officers by encouraging reasonable and measured risk-taking in the interests of our business and our shareholders, and protecting against liabilities incurred in the performance of their duties to the maximum extent permitted by Ohio law.
The agreements provide for indemnification for all expenses, including attorney fees, judgments, fines, and settlement amounts, that the executive officer incurs by reason of his or her service:
48 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
in a civil action or proceeding by another party (unless it is proven that the officer’s act or failure to act was taken with deliberate intent to cause injury to our business or in reckless disregard for the best interest of our business); or
in a criminal action or proceeding (unless the officer had reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful).
During fiscal year 2019,2021, we made various executive perquisites available to each of the Named Executive Officers. These perquisites are offered to promote the business objectives for each perquisite as described below and to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive to attract, retain and motivate the individuals necessary to advance the goals of The Win Strategy. The costs of these perquisites for the Named Executive Officers reportable for fiscal year 20192021 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2021.
Private ClubsClubs. . We pay or reimburse initiation fees for one private club for each executive officer. We offer this perquisite to encourage executive officers to entertain business colleagues and customers, engage in social interaction with peers from other companies, local leadership and the community, and hold business meetings at offsiteoff-site locations. Historically we have paid or reimbursed the initiation fees and provided gross up payments on those fees for additional clubs for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the President, and the Chief Operating Officer and at the Executive and Senior Vice President levels on a business-needs basis and only with appropriate advance approval. We maintain a policy of not providing gross up payments on private club initiation fees, and in fiscal year 20192021 no such gross up payments were made.
Spousal TravelTravel. . In limited circumstances and only with appropriate advance approval, we reimburse our executive officers for transportation, lodging, meals, entertainment and other travel expenses for their spouses or other family members who accompany them onout-of-town business. We offer these perquisites to encourage executive officers to spend an appropriate amount of time with their direct reports in locations away from corporate headquarters, to allow executive officers and their spouses to develop a more personal relationship with the executive officers’ subordinates and their families, and to encourage spouses to attend retirement parties, funerals, business dinners and other corporate functions at locations away from their homes.
Executive PhysicalsPhysicals. . We pay for annual physicals and any necessary travel vaccinations for each of our executive officers and certain other key employees.team members. We offer this benefit as part of our overall preventive medicine program to promptly identify and address medical issues and to preserve our investment in our executive officers by encouraging them to maintain healthy lifestyles and be proactive in addressing actual or potential health issues.
Leased VehiclesVehicles. . We lease an automobile for each of our executive officers and for certain other key employees.team members. We offer this perquisite to provide executive officers with use of a company car for business travel needs, recognizing that the vehicles can also be used for personal purposes. We pay or reimburse each executive officer for lease payments on one automobile, typically for a three-year term. Each executive officer has a maximum allowance of $1,570 per month. We also reimburse each executive officer for the cost of tires and maintenance and provide insurance on each vehicle during the lease term. We require each executive officer to take title to his or her vehicle at the end of the lease term because we amortize the entire cost of the vehicle over the lease term. We pay or reimburse each executive officer for sales taxes on his or her vehicle at the time of title transfer, but the executive officer is responsible for the payment of all income taxes assessed on payments and reimbursements made during the lease term and at the time of title transfer, including those assessed on the fair market value of the vehicle at the time of title transfer.
Matching Gifts ProgramProgram. . We match any amount in excess of $20$50 contributed to any accredited educational institution by an active, full-time employee, retiree, or member of our Board of Directors with at least one year of service. Our matching contributions are capped at $5,000 per fiscal year for any individual’s contribution to any single institution, and $10,000 per fiscal year for any individual’s aggregate contributions to all institutions.
Company ApartmentsApartments. . We maintain apartments in Cleveland, Ohio, and Newport Beach, California and London, England to provide accommodations to employeesteam members workingoff-site at or relocating to our primary facilities. The apartments are also available to the executive officers for personal use with appropriate advance approval if the apartments are not otherwise being used for business purposes.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 49 |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Entertainment VenuesVenues. . We maintain loges, boxes and tickets at various entertainment venues to provide civic support to arts, entertainment and other cultural activities at certain significant business locations and to provide a favorable setting for our employeesteam members to entertain customers and other business associates. The loges, boxes and tickets are, however, available to executive officers for
personal use if they are not otherwise being used for business purposes. We pay all costs of admission, but all costs of food are paid by the executive officer using the venue only for personal use.
Corporate AircraftAircraft. . Effective May 1, 2019, the Committee elected to offer limitednon-business use of our corporate aircraft to our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer for purposes of their safety, security, confidentiality and productivity while traveling. Such use is limited to U.S. domestic travel only and 50 hours of flight time per fiscal year for our Chief Executive Officer and 30 hours of flight time per fiscal year to each of our President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Otherwise,non-business use of our corporate aircraft by our executive officers is only available if (a) the flight was previously authorized for business purposes, there are available seats that are not being used for those business purposes and the officer’s use does not involve a deviation or extension of the planned business-travel itinerary, or (b) there is a medical emergency or other special circumstance and the flight ispre-approved by our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer or Chief Financial Officer.
CONSIDERATION OF 20182020 SAY-ON-PAY VOTING RESULTS
At our 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we received approval, based on the total votes cast, for our advisory“say-on-pay” vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Committee and Mercer specifically considered the voting results when exploring potential changes to our executive compensation program in fiscal year 2019.2021. The Committee believes the voting results demonstrate strong, consistent support for our executive compensation program. The Committee will continue to explore with Mercer potential improvements to our executive compensation program to the extent appropriate to keep our executive compensation program aligned with best practices in our competitive market.
50 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with the Corporation’s management and, based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Human Resources and Compensation Committee:
Candy M. Obourn,Joseph Scaminace, Chair
Robert G. Bohn
Kevin A. Lobo
Joseph ScaminaceCandy M. Obourn
James R. Verrier
James L. Wainscott
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 51 |
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table sets forth compensation information for our Named Executive Officers.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Stock ($)(2) | Option ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) |
Change in Value and ($)(5) | All Other Compensation ($)(6) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams, | 2019 |
| 1,250,000 |
|
| 5,173,005 |
|
| 2,980,930 |
|
| 3,148,895 |
|
| 4,757,754 |
|
| 161,916 |
|
| 17,472,500 |
| ||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2018 | 1,200,000 | 6,068,600 | 2,961,344 | 2,167,473 | 5,667,239 | 173,790 | 18,238,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 1,125,000 | 5,303,474 | 2,935,010 | 2,418,118 | 3,372,639 | 173,860 | 15,328,101 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever, Executive Vice President – | 2019 |
| 750,800 |
|
| 1,396,550 |
|
| 804,902 |
|
| 1,123,604 |
|
| 2,732,897 |
|
| 99,632 |
|
| 6,908,385 |
| ||||||||
2018 | 715,000 | 1,580,843 | 771,284 | 860,970 | 1,461,719 | 106,816 | 5,496,632 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 570,747 | 1,849,646 | 153,010 | 538,377 | 343,023 | 96,011 | 3,550,814 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks, | 2019 |
| 1,000,000 |
|
| 4,828,211 |
|
| 1,341,382 |
|
| 1,738,634 |
|
| 2,632,389 |
|
| 234,326 |
|
| 11,774,942 |
| ||||||||
President and Chief | 2018 | 950,000 | 2,909,002 | 1,419,098 | 1,417,466 | 2,102,817 | 150,410 | 8,948,793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 900,000 | 2,571,744 | 1,422,993 | 1,622,363 | 931,306 | 166,586 | 7,614,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone, | 2019 |
| 605,000 |
|
| 1,621,259 |
|
| 357,653 |
|
| 703,600 |
|
| -- |
|
| 784,314 |
|
| 4,071,826 |
| ||||||||
Vice President and President – | 2018 | 565,100 | 758,053 | 370,088 | 491,122 | -- | 708,893 | 2,893,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 467,575 | 892,289 | 275,696 | 433,069 | -- | 643,788 | 2,712,417 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier(7) | 2019 |
| 551,458 |
|
| 1,793,819 |
|
| 243,086 |
|
| 642,674 |
|
| -- |
|
| 540,551 |
|
| 3,771,588 |
| ||||||||
Vice President and President –
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Option Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(5) | All Other Compensation | Total ($) | ||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 2021 | 1,159,375 | 4,845,449 | 4,224,085 | 3,326,023 | 3,344,243 | 135,325 | 17,034,500 | ||||||||
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 2020 | 1,159,375 | 5,350,280 | 2,992,950 | 3,230,087 | 5,986,427 | 143,742 | 18,862,861 | ||||||||
2019 | 1,250,000 | 5,173,005 | 2,980,930 | 3,148,895 | 4,757,754 | 161,916 | 17,472,500 | |||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno (7) | 2021 | 510,725 | 2,968,166 | 201,042 | 701,647 | 376,387 | 213,444 | 4,971,411 | ||||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 2021 | 971,250 | 2,213,292 | 1,931,105 | 1,792,662 | 1,051,869 | 224,943 | 8,185,121 | ||||||||
President and Chief Operating Officer | 2020 | 971,250 | 2,455,433 | 1,372,950 | 1,737,379 | 3,543,794 | 215,145 | 10,295,951 | ||||||||
2019 | 1,000,000 | 4,828,211 | 1,341,382 | 1,738,634 | 2,632,389 | 234,326 | 11,774,942 | |||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 2021 | 615,030 | 646,543 | 562,918 | 961,414 | — | 301,775 | 3,087,680 | ||||||||
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | 2020 | 615,030 | 834,509 | 466,763 | 737,088 | — | 293,406 | 2,946,796 | ||||||||
2019 | 605,000 | 620,654 | 357,653 | 717,294 | — | 545,826 | 2,846,427 | |||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks (8) | 2021 | 571,140 | 646,543 | 562,918 | 783,664 | — | 290,457 | 2,854,722 | ||||||||
Vice President and | 2020 | 571,140 | 688,038 | 384,413 | 648,957 | — | 638,204 | 2,930,752 | ||||||||
President - Engineered Materials Group | ||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever (9) | 2021 | 350,000 | — | 1,206,803 | 573,187 | 1,825,904 | 103,097 | 4,058,991 | ||||||||
Former Executive Vice President - Finance and | 2020 | 750,000 | 1,594,690 | 892,350 | 1,146,609 | 3,867,370 | 103,432 | 8,354,451 | ||||||||
Administration and Chief Financial Officer | 2019 | 750,800 | 1,396,550 | 804,902 | 1,123,604 | 2,732,897 | 99,632 | 6,908,385 |
(1) | Reflects the impact of a reduction in base salary in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 in accordance with cost control measures implemented in response to the economic downturn and COVID-19.Includes the following amounts deferred under the Savings Restoration Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan for fiscal year |
Savings Restoration Plan: Mr. Williams—$25,156; Mr. Leombruno—$10,942; Mr. Banks—$27,687; Mr. Leonti—$26,619; Mr. Weeks—$26,503; and Ms. Suever—$7,500.
Executive Deferral Plan: Mr. Leombruno—$33,609; and Mr. Leonti—$50,000. These amounts are also reported in the “Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year” column of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2021 table on page 60. |
|
|
(2) | For |
(3) | Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for Stock Appreciation Rights granted in fiscal year |
Fiscal Year of Grant | Participant | Grant Date | Type of Grant | Risk-free Interest Rate | Expected Life of Award | Expected Dividend Yield of Stock | Expected Volatility of Stock | |||||||
2019
|
Named Executive Officers
| 8/15/2018
| annual grant
| 2.81%
| 5.68 years
| 1.92%
| 24.1%
|
52 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement |
|
COMPENSATION TABLES
Fiscal Year
| Participant
| Grant
| Type of
| Risk-free
| Expected Life
| Expected Dividend
| Expected Volatility
| |||||||
2021 | Named Executive Officers | 8/12/2020 | annual grant | 0.50% | 6.45 years | 2.01% | 33.7% |
During fiscal year 2021, no Stock Incentive awards were forfeited by any of the Named Executive Officers.
(4) | Amounts consist of the following Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses with PGI Multiplier, if applicable, and Converted RONA Bonuses for fiscal year |
|
Converted RONA Bonus for fiscal year 2021: Mr. Williams—$111,076; Mr. Leombruno—$74,762; Mr. Banks—$110,483; Mr. Leonti—$75,955; Mr. Weeks—$75,955; and Ms. Suever—$35,837. Amount also includes the following amount deferred under the Executive Deferral Plan: Executive Deferral Plan: Mr. Leombruno—$33,609; and ..Mr. Leonti—$50,000. |
|
(5) | Amounts consist of the change in annual actuarial present value of pension benefits for Messrs. Williams and Banks and Ms. Suever, as also reported in the Pension Benefits for Fiscal Year |
(6) | The following table describes each component of the All Other Compensation column: |
Name | Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans (a) | Life Insurance Premiums Paid | Dividend Equivalents on RSUs (b) | Perquisites (c) | Total “All Other Compensation” | Company Contributions Defined Contribution
| Life Insurance
| Dividend
| Perquisites
| Total “All Other Compensation”
| ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams |
| $17,117 |
|
| $81,254 |
| $0 |
| $63,545 |
|
| $161,916 |
| $17,057 | $47,490 | $— | $70,778 | $135,325 | ||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 69,407 | 69,730 | — | 74,307 | 213,444 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 17,577 | 41,043 | 107,215 | 59,108 | 224,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 219,600 | 43,146 | — | 39,029 | 301,775 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 196,064 | 55,168 | 12,001 | 27,224 | 290,457 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever |
| 17,055 |
|
| 44,251 |
| 13,588 |
| 24,738 |
|
| 99,632 |
| 5,480 | — | — | 97,617 | 103,097 | ||||||||||
Lee C. Banks |
| 17,330 |
|
| 53,408 |
| 92,316 |
| 71,272 |
|
| 234,326 |
| |||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone |
| 651,081 |
|
| 53,100 |
| 46,168 |
| 33,965 |
|
| 784,314 |
| |||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier
|
| 454,218
|
|
| 35,035
|
| 18,992
|
| 32,306
|
|
| 540,551
|
|
(a) | Amount consists of the following company contributions to our Defined Contribution Plans: |
Retirement Savings Plan:Mr. Williams—$11,317;11,622; Mr. Leombruno—$15,397; Mr. Banks—$11,575; Mr. Leonti—$25,368; Mr. Weeks—$22,602; and Ms. Suever—$10,990; Mr. Banks—$11,230; Mr. Malone—$22,263; and Ms. Parmentier—$21,088.3,800.
Savings Restoration Plan:Mr. Williams—$5,800;5,435; Mr. Leombruno—$2,451; Mr. Banks—$6,002; Mr. Leonti—$44,383; Mr. Weeks—$39,177; and Ms. Suever—$6,065; Mr. Banks—$6,100; Mr. Malone—$35,696; and Ms. Parmentier—$32,887.1,680.
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program:Mr. Malone—Leombruno—$593,122;51,559; Mr. Leonti—$149,851; and Ms. Parmentier—Mr. Weeks—$400,243.134,285.
(b) | Reported in this column are cash dividends that |
(c) | Reported in this column are amounts reimbursed or incurred by us with respect to: (i) executive long-term disability insurance premiums; and (ii) one or more of the following executive perquisites: (A) leased vehicle, including state sales tax if applicable; (B) spousal travel; (C) executive physicals; (D) matching gifts |
(7) |
|
(8) | Mr. Weeks was not a Named Executive Officer for |
(9) | Ms. Suever retired as an executive officer in December 2020, but still qualifies as a Named Executive Officer. |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 53 |
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table sets forth information with respect tonon-equity and equity incentive plan awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2019.2021. The LTIP Awards RSUs and Stock Incentives listed below have been granted under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other | Exercise ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Awards ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Date | Compensation (If Different than Grant | Estimated Future Payouts UnderNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Plan Awards | All Other Options (#) | Exercise Awards | Grant Date Fair Value of Awards ($) | Date | Compensation Committee Action Date (If Different than Grant Date) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold
| Target
| Maximum
| Threshold
| Target
| Maximum
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 812,500 | 1,625,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 927,500 | 1,855,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 1,062,500 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 1,126,250 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 78,140 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 80,490 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3) | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 32,989 | 65,978 | — | — | 5,173,005(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY 21-22-23)(3) | 1/27/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 19,452 | 38,904 | — | — | 4,845,449(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 81,180 | 166.49 | 2,980,930 | 8/12/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 76,690 | 209.56 | 4,224,085 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 78,100 | 156,200 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 360,000 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 53,130 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21)(4) | 1/1/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,388 | 4,776 | — | — | 622,128(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY20-21-22)(4) | 1/1/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 3,448 | 6,896 | — | — | 898,464(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY 21-22-23)(3) | 1/27/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 5,555 | 11,110 | — | — | 1,447,575(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 8/12/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,650 | 209.56 | 201,042 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 472,500 | 945,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 577,500 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 80,060 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY 21-22-23)(3) | 1/27/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 8,886 | 17,772 | — | — | 2,213,292(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 8/12/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35,060 | 209.56 | 1,931,105 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 194,200 | 388,400 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 226,590 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 55,040 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY 21-22-23)(3) | 1/27/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 4,199 | 5,192 | — | — | 646,543(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 8/12/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | 10,220 | 209.56 | 562,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 194,200 | 388,400 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 240,480 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 55,040 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY 21-22-23)(3) | 1/27/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 3,462 | 5,192 | — | — | 646,543(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 8/12/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,220 | 209.56 | 562,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 300,300 | 600,600 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 320,000 | 640,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 337,860 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 360,000 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 53,610 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2020 | — | — | 55,220 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3) | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 8,906 | 17,812 | — | — | 1,396,550(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,050 | 166.49 | 804,902 | 8/12/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21,910 | 209.56 | 1,206,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 450,000 | 900,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 550,000 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 77,720 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs (4) | 8/15/2018 | 7/24/2018 | — | — | — | — | 15,020 | 15,020 | — | — | 2,500,680 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3) | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 14,843 | 29,686 | — | — | 2,327,531(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36,530 | 166.49 | 1,341,382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 151,300 | 218,400 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 242,000 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 53,440 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs (4) | 8/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | 6,010 | 6,010 | — | — | 1,000,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3) | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3,958 | 7,916 | — | — | 620,654(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 9,740 | 166.49 | 357,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Incentive Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 146,300 | 292,600 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 234,000 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converted RONA Bonus | 8/15/2018 | — | 0 | 53,270 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs (4) | 8/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | 6,010 | 6,010 | — | — | 1,000,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3) | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2,685 | 5,370 | — | — | 421,035(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Incentives | 1/23/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,620 | 166.49 | 1,102,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY17-18-19) (5) | 2/1/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 351 | 702 | — | — | 57,701(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY18-19-20) (5) | 2/1/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 677 | 1,354 | — | — | 111,292(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)(5) | 2/1/2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1,236 | 2,472 | — | — | 203,186(2) |
54 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
(1) | There are no maximum amounts for General RONA Bonuses or Converted RONA Bonuses. General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses are calculated as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page |
(2) | Calculated assuming a payout of 100% as described in footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year |
(3) | Includes earned LTIP award shares in the form of dividend equivalent units for those LTIPs awarded for the calendar |
(4) |
|
|
The elements of executive compensation included in each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192021 on page 5452 and the compensation programs under which the grants described in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192021 table above were made are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
Parker Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 55 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT JUNEOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT JUNE 30, 20192021
The following table sets forth information with respect to Stock Incentives and stock awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of June 30, 2019.2021.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of (#) | Number of (#) | Option ($) | Option Expiration Date | Equity Plan Awards: of Shares, Other Rights Not Vested (#) |
Equity | ||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 0 | 33,422(2) | 116.46 | 1/31/2025 | — | — | ||||||||||
67,200 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | |||||||||||
26,240 | 0 | 113.19 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | |||||||||||
34,840 | 0 | 106.18 | 8/13/2023 | — | — | |||||||||||
70,333 | 35,167(3) | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||||||
30,780 | 61,560(4) | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
0 | 81,180(5) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 35,470(6) | 6,030,255 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 29,060(7) | 4,940,491 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 32,989(8) | 5,608,460 | |||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 2,080 | 0 | 62.35 | 8/10/2020 | — | — | ||||||||||
5,200 | 0 | 69.10 | 8/16/2021 | — | — | |||||||||||
5,230 | 0 | 81.86 | 8/14/2022 | — | — | |||||||||||
6,660 | 0 | 106.18 | 8/13/2023 | — | — | |||||||||||
5,010 | 0 | 113.19 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | |||||||||||
4,820 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | |||||||||||
3,667 | 1,833(3) | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||||||
8,017 | 16,033(4) | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
0 | 21,920(5) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 7,833(6) | 1,331,688 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 7,570(7) | 1,286,976 | |||||||||||
8,906(8) | 1,514,109 | |||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 4,300(9) | 731,043 | |||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 0 | 22,281(2) | 116.46 | 1/31/2025 | — | — | ||||||||||
44,800 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | |||||||||||
26,240 | 0 | 113.19 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | |||||||||||
34,840 | 0 | 106.18 | 8/13/2023 | — | — | |||||||||||
35,990 | 0 | 81.86 | 8/14/2022 | — | — | |||||||||||
34,100 | 17,050(3) | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||||||
14,750 | 29,500(4) | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
0 | 36,530(5) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 17,200(6) | 2,924,172 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 13,930(7) | 2,368,239 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 14,843(8) | 2,523,458 | |||||||||||
14,194(10) | 2,413,122 | |||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 15,020(11) | 2,553,550 | |||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | 8,680 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | ||||||||||
2,920 | 0 | 113.19 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | |||||||||||
3,870 | 0 | 106.18 | 8/13/2023 | — | — | |||||||||||
6,607 | 3,303(3) | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||||||
3,847 | 7,693(4) | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
0 | 9,740(5) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 4,614(6) | 784,426 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,630(7) | 617,136 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,958(8) | 672,900 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 8,600(12) | 1,462,086 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 6,010(13) | 1,021,760 | |||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | 587 | 1,173 | 81.86 | 8/14/2022 | — | — | ||||||||||
1,653 | 827 | 106.18 | 8/13/2023 | — | — | |||||||||||
2,330 | 0 | 113.19 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | |||||||||||
8,680 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | |||||||||||
6,607 | 3,303(3) | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||||||
2,614 | 5,226(4) | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||||||
0 | 6,620(5) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,681(6) | 625,807 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,147(7) | 535,021 | |||||||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,921(8) | 666,609 | |||||||||||
6,010(13)
|
| 1,021,760
|
|
Name
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||
Number of
| Number of
| Option ($)
| Option
| Equity Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
| Equity Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
| |||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 67,200 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | ||||||
105,500 | 0 | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||
92,340 | 0 | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||
54,120 | 51,620(2) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||
29,560 | 59,120(3) | 158.90 | 8/13/2029 | — | — | |||||||
0 | 76,690(4) | 209.56 | 8/11/2030 | — | — | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 34,079(5) | 10,466,002 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 27,297(6) | 8,383,182 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 19,452(7)
| 5,973,904
| |||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 410 | 0 | 113.19 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | ||||||
1,230 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | |||||||
1,410 | 0 | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||
4,040 | 0 | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||
2,273 | 1,137(2) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||
1,357 | 2,713(3) | 158.90 | 8/13/2029 | — | — | |||||||
0 | 3,650(4) | 209.56 | 8/11/2030 | — | — | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,817(5) | 1,172,239 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 4,696(6) | 1,442,189 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 5,555(7)
| 1,705,996
| |||||||
Lee C. Banks | 44,800 | 0 | 113.23 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | ||||||
51,150 | 0 | 124.36 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||
44,250 | 0 | 158.79 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||
24,353 | 12,177(2) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||
13560 | 27,120(3) | 158.90 | 8/13/2029 | — | — | |||||||
0 | 35,060(4) | 209.56 | 8/11/2030 | — | — | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 15,333(5) | 4,708,918 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 12,528(6) | 3,847,474 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 8,886(7) | 2,728,979 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 14,194(8) | 4,359,119 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 15,020(9)
| 4,612,792
| |||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 0 | 3,247(2) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | ||||||
0 | 9,220(3) | 158.90 | 8/13/2029 | — | — | |||||||
0 | 10,220(4) | 209.56 | 8/11/2030 | — | — | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 4,089(5) | 1,255,773 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 4,257(6) | 1,307,367 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 2,596(7)
| 797,258
| |||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 6,493 | 3,247(2) | 166.49 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | ||||||
3,797 | 7,593(3) | 158.90 | 8/13/2029 | — | — | |||||||
0 | 10,220(4) | 209.56 | 8/11/2030 | — | — | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 4,089(5) | 1,255,773 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,510(6) | 1,077,956 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 2,596(7) | 797,258 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 3,270(10)
| 1,004,250
| |||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 5,010 | — | 113.19 | 8/13/2023 | — | — | ||||||
4,820 | — | 113.23 | 8/12/2024 | — | — | |||||||
5,500 | — | 124.36 | 8/11/2025 | — | — | |||||||
24,050 | — | 158.79 | 8/16/2026 | — | — | |||||||
14,613 | 7,307(2) | 166.49 | 8/15/2027 | — | — | |||||||
8,814 | 17,626(3) | 158.90 | 8/14/2028 | — | — | |||||||
— | 21,910(4) | 209.56 | 8/13/2029 | — | — | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 9,200(5) | 2,825,412 | |||||||
— | — | — | — | 8,137(6)
| 2,498,954
|
56 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
(1) | The market value is calculated by multiplying the closing price of our Common Stock on June 30, |
(2) |
|
|
|
Represents Stock Incentives granted on August 15, 2018. The Stock Incentives vest in three equal annual installments beginning August 15, 2019. |
|
|
Assumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of the target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued employment through the end of the performance period (December 31, 2021), actual payouts under the calendar |
|
(7) | Assumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of the target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued employment through the end of the performance period (December 31, 2023), actual payouts under the calendar years 2021-22-23 LTIP Awards will be in common shares to be issued in April 2024 following the Committee’s certification of our performance results, subject to the Committee’s exercise of any discretion to reduce the amount payable and the Committee’s authorization of payment. These amounts include the dividend equivalent units for LTIP awards beginning January 2020. |
(8) | Represents the grant of 14,194 Restricted Stock Units, awarded on August 17, 2016 to Mr. Banks. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grants will vest on August 17, 2022. |
Represents the grant of 15,020 Restricted Stock Units, awarded August 15, 2018, to Mr. Banks. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grants will vest on August 5, 2022. |
Represents the grant of |
Parker Hannifin Corporation |
|
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table sets forth information with respect to Stock Incentives that were exercised during fiscal year 20192021 and common shares issued under LTIP Awards and RSUs that vested for the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2019.2021.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | Acquired on (#) | Value Realized on ($)(1) | Acquired on (#) | Value Realized Vesting ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 0 | 0 |
| 32,109 |
|
| 4,788,737 |
| 94,502 | 13,126,919 | 28,409 | 7,738,896 | ||||||||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 1,420 | 213,576 | 2,314 | 630,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 135,752 | 11,398,566 | 25,382 | 6,914,311 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 12,023 | 587,551 | 7,179 | 1,955,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 26,390 | 2,716,801 | 6,614 | 1,801,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 0 | 0 |
| 5,694 |
|
| 849,204 |
| 11,890 | 2,083,893 | 7,469 | 2,034,630 | ||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 0 | 0 |
| 32,520 |
|
| 4,850,033 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | 0 | 0 |
| 7,837 |
|
| 1,168,811 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier
| 0
| 0
|
| 6,295
|
|
| 938,837
|
|
(1) | Calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired by the difference between the exercise price and closing price of our common stock on the exercise date. |
(2) | Calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired by the closing price of our common stock on the applicable vesting date. |
58 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
PENSION BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019PENSION BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table sets forth the actuarial present value of the benefits accumulated by each of the Named Executive Officers under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Program.
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Plan Name |
Number of Years of Credited (#)(1) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | ||||
Thomas L. Williams | Pension Plan | 17.6 | 815,181 | 0 | ||||
Pension Restoration Plan | 14.9 | 6,941,122 | 0 | |||||
Supplemental Retirement Program | 17.6 | 25,222,469 | 0 | |||||
Todd M. Leombruno | Pension Plan | 28.1 | 938,603 | 0 | ||||
Pension Restoration Plan | 28.1 | 1,067,687 | 0 | |||||
Supplemental Retirement Program | — | — | 0 | |||||
Lee C. Banks | Pension Plan | 29.6 | 1,205,792 | 0 | ||||
Pension Restoration Plan | 29.6 | 11,319,244 | 0 | |||||
Supplemental Retirement Program | 29.6 | 6,597,786 | 0 | |||||
Joseph R. Leonti(3) | Pension Plan | — | 0 | 0 | ||||
Pension Restoration Plan | — | 0 | 0 | |||||
Supplemental Retirement Program | — | 0 | 0 | |||||
Andrew M. Weeks(3) | Pension Plan | — | 0 | 0 | ||||
Pension Restoration Plan | — | 0 | 0 | |||||
Supplemental Retirement Program | — | 0 | 0 | |||||
Catherine A. Suever | Pension Plan | 33.6 | 42,321 | 1,553,567 | ||||
Pension Restoration Plan | 31.3 | 3,767,467 | 0 | |||||
Supplemental Retirement Program | 33.6 | 10,049,229 | 0 |
(1) | Credited Service in the Pension Restoration Plan is frozen as of the date the Named Executive Officer becomes 100% vested in the |
(2) | The present value of the accumulated benefits is calculated under each plan using the following assumptions: (i) a discount rate of |
For the Pension Plan, additional assumptions include: (i) participants elect a life annuity; and (ii) the Pri-2012 Mortality Table projected generationally with Scale MP-2020.
|
For the Pension Restoration Plan, using each Named Executive Officer’s participant elections under the Pension Restoration Plan, additional assumptions include: (i) calculating lump sums using the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code (ii) discount segment rates of 0.61%, 2.84% and 3.54%.
For the Supplemental Retirement Program, using each Named Executive Officer’s participant elections under the Supplemental Retirement Program, additional assumptions include: (i) calculating lump sums using the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (ii) a discount rate of 2.50%. |
|
(3) |
|
The Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Program are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
Parker Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 59 |
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table sets forth the contributions, earnings, withdrawals/distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Savings Restoration Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program during fiscal year 2019.2021.
Name | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) | Aggregate ($) | Aggregate Distributions | Aggregate Balance at End ($) |
Executive | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan |
| 25,000 |
|
| 5,800 |
|
| 51,465 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 782,178(3) |
| 25,156 | 5,435 | 414,805 | — | 1,318,918(3) | ||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 1,518 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 24,668 | — | — | 10,940 | — | 34,868 | |||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan | 10,942 | 2,451 | 202,781 | — | 620,294(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan | 33,609 | — | 52,059 | — | 197,125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | — | 51,559 | 55,109 | — | 235,540 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan | 27,687 | 6,002 | 781,512 | — | 2,230,035(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan | — | — | 4,185,242 | — | 12,889,533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan | 26,619 | 44,383 | 139,354 | — | 568,656(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan | 50,000 | — | 95,453 | — | 428,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | — | 149,850 | 855,618 | — | 3,659,236 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan | 26,503 | 39,177 | 203,319 | — | 666,357(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | — | 134,284 | 1,108,950 | — | 4,017,143 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan |
| 25,895 |
|
| 6,065 |
|
| 31,732 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 763,521(3) |
| 7,500 | 338,478 | 1,136,829 | — | |||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 16,813 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 275,834 | — | — | 69,925 | 17,208 | 327,855 | |||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan |
| 26,250 |
|
| 6,100 |
|
| 61,561 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 1,327,978(3) |
| |||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 326,848 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 8,618,634 | ||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan |
| 25,520 |
|
| 35,696 |
|
| 5,458 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 173,632(3) |
| |||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program |
| 0 |
|
| 593,122 |
|
| 84,406 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 3,323,043 | ||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings Restoration Plan |
| 26,820 |
|
| 32,887 |
|
| 13,105 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 194,584(3) |
| |||||||||||||||
Executive Deferral Plan |
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program |
| 0 |
|
| 400,243 |
|
| 68,626 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 1,773,014 |
(1) | For each of the Named Executive Officers, amounts are included in the “Salary” |
(2) | Amounts are included along with our contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan, which is a qualified deferred compensation plan, in the “Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans” column in the All Other Compensation components table in footnote 6 of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year |
(3) | Includes the following amounts that were deferred during fiscal year |
The Savings Restoration Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan, and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. The investment options under each of the plans are identical. During fiscal year 2019,2021, there were up to eleven investment funds that a Named Executive Officer could choose with annual rates of return for the year ended June 30, 2019,2021, ranging from (13.26)%(4.85%) to 12.08%57.58%. Under the plans, participants have the ability to change their investments at any time.
60 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION TABLES
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROLPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL
AT JUNEAT JUNE 30, 20192021
Each of the Named Executive Officers may be entitled to payments under our executive compensation program upon a termination of employment or a change in control. The events which may trigger these payments include death, long-term disability, retirement, termination for cause, termination without cause, resignation, change in control or a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control. The following narratives and tables describe the payments the Named Executive Officers may receive under the written terms of our executive compensation program plans and arrangements as in effect on June 30, 2019,2021, for each triggering event as if the triggering event occurred on June 30, 2019.2021. Payments to Ms. Suever, who retired as an executive officer on December 31, 2020, are described under the caption “Payments to Ms. Suever,” below.
During fiscal year 2016 we adopted new Change in Control Agreements and amended our Executive Deferral Plan to exclude taxgross-ups and to eliminate “modified single trigger” vesting acceleration on a change in control; however, each of the Named Executive Officers became an executive officer prior to our implementation of these changes and, therefore, continue to have agreements that contain taxgross-ups on a change in control and modified single trigger vesting acceleration on a change in control.
For each of the termination of employment scenarios described in this section, the estimated potential payments and benefits that might be received by each Named Executive Officer is displayed in the table that immediately follows that description.
Payments Generally Available
A Named Executive Officer will generally receive the following upon termination of employment:
base salary earned but not yet paid as of the date of termination;
Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses (with the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable), and Converted RONA Bonuses earned but not yet paid as of the date of termination;
LTIP Award payouts for the most recently completed three-year performance period not yet paid as of the date of termination;
amounts accrued and vested under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Program as of the date of termination, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement;
vested account balances under the Retirement Savings Plan, the Savings Restoration Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program as of the date of termination, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement; and
any accrued and unused vacation pay as of the date of termination.
The Committee may, however, reduce any payments of a Target Incentive Bonus, General RONA Bonus (with the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable), or LTIP Award payout in its sole discretion, up to and including a reduction to zero.
In determining the amounts reflected in the following tables, we used the following general assumptions and principles.
We assumed that each of the triggering events occurred on June 30, 2019.2021. This includes our assumption that, upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control, the qualifying termination and change in control both occurred on June 30, 2019.2021.
We did not include amounts for base salaries, Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses (including the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable), or Converted RONA Bonuses in the following tables because the amounts are already earned and are not affected by the triggering events, which are assumed to occur on June 30, 2019.2021.
Amounts were calculated based on each Named Executive Officer’s age, compensation and years of service as of June 30, 2019.2021.
Parker Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 61 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
All present values of pension amounts shown for the Pension Plan assume a 3.28%2.55% discount rate, theRP-2006Pri-2012 Mortality Table projected generationally with ScaleMP-2018,MP-2020, and assume that the annuity payment elected is 50% joint and survivor.
With the exception of the values for the Supplemental Retirement Program in the “Change in Control” and “Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control” columns, all lump sum values of pension amounts shown assume the following:
for the Pension Restoration Plan, segment rates (afterphase-in) of 2.72%0.51%, 3.76%2.31% and 4.33%3.15%, and the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code; and
for the Supplemental Retirement Program, a 2.89%2.50% discount rate and the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.
We did not include amounts for account balances in the Retirement Savings Plan because this plan is available to all salaried employees. We did not include amounts for account balances under the Savings Restoration Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan because these amounts, which are reported under the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192021 table on page 62,60, would not be increased in connection with any triggering event.
Payments upon Death
Upon the death of a Named Executive Officer, in addition to the “Payments Generally Available” described above, the estate or beneficiary of the Named Executive Officer will receive the following:
accelerated vesting of all outstanding Stock Incentives;
for Stock Incentives granted on or before August 11, 2010, and for Stock Incentives granted on or after August 17, 2011, if the Named Executive Officer is not retirement eligible at the time of death, retention of all outstanding Stock Incentives for the earlier of (i) two years after the Named Executive Officer’s death or (ii) the expiration date listed in the grant letter;
for Stock Incentives granted on or after August 17, 2011, if the Named Executive Officer is retirement eligible at the time of death, retention of all outstanding Stock Incentives until the expiration date listed in the grant letter;
accelerated vesting of the unvested portion of the Named Executive Officer’s account under our Executive Deferral Plan;
account balance in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program provided the Named Executive Officer has completed 60 calendar months of service at his or her date of death;
pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar years2017-18-19 and2018-19-202019-20-21 performance periodsperiod to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods,period, based on the full number of calendar quarters of continuous employment during the2017-18-19 and2018-19-202019-20-21 calendar yearyears performance periods;period;
pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212020-21-22 and 2021-22-23 performance periodperiods to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the full number of months of continuous employment during the2019-20-212020-21-22 and 2021-22-23 calendar yearyears performance period;periods; and
death benefits under the Officer Life Insurance Plan as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23.24.
62 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION TABLES
In determining the amounts payable upon death reported in the following tables, the following assumptions and principles were used;used:
To calculate the estimated value of the LTIP Awards, we assumed a payout of 100% of thepro-rated LTIP Award target amount and used our closing stock price on June 30, 2019, $170.01.2021, $307.11. Because the payout of the LTIP Awards is dependent upon our performance against the Peer Group companies during the three-year performance period, a Named Executive Officer’s actual payout could range from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 200% of the Named Executive Officer’spro-rated LTIP Award target amount.
The death benefit payable under the Officer Life Insurance Plan is funded through individual life insurance policies owned by each of the Named Executive Officers that would be paid by the insurance company issuing the policy.
PAYMENTS UPON DEATH
Officer
| Accelerated
| Accelerated
| Pension
| Pension
| Supplemental
| LTIP
| Defined
| Officer
| Totals
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 3,395,122 | — | 302,644 | 2,512,867 | 21,484,239 | 8,430,201 | — | 3,400,000 | 39,525,073 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 83,676 | 731,043 | 575,448 | 1,328,817 | 6,492,379 | 2,003,143 | — | 3,003,200 | 14,217,706 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 1,971,480 | 4,966,672 | 357,294 | 2,288,816 | 12,460,621 | 4,041,506 | — | 4,000,000 | 30,086,389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | 150,782 | 2,483,846 | — | — | — | 1,074,407 | 3,323,043 | 1,815,000 | 8,847,078 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | 306,969 | 1,021,760 | — | — | — | 900,118 | 1,773,014 | 1,582,500 | 5,584,361 |
Officer | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Incentives | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Units | Pension Plan | Pension Restoration Plan | Supplemental Retirement Program | LTIP Awards | Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | Officer Life Insurance Death Benefits | Totals | |||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 23,502,089 | — | 425,926 | 3,372,299 | 26,991,043 | 12,878,372 | — | 3,400,000 | 70,569,729 | |||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 918,036 | — | 356,248 | 351,147 | — | 1,694,053 | 235,540 | 1,886,100 | 5,441,124 | |||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 11,463,570 | 8,971,912 | 505,356 | 4,299,415 | 13,503,755 | 5,832,139 | — | 4,200,000 | 48,776,147 | |||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 2,820,050 | — | — | — | — | 1,695,975 | 3,364,920 | 1,942,200 | 9,823,145 | |||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 2,578,913 | 1,004,250 | — | — | — | 1,581,269 | 4,017,143 | 1,803,600 | 10,985,175 |
Payments upon Long-Term Disability
Upon the long-term disability of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above and the “Payments Upon Death” described above, except that:
(i) | the term for all outstanding Stock Incentives will continue for the remainder of theirten-year terms; |
(ii) | the account balance in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program will be paid in a single lump sum as of the date of disability; and |
(iii) | the Named Executive Officer will not receive death benefits under the Officer Life Insurance Plan until death subsequently occurs. |
In addition, the Named Executive Officer will receive the following:
monthly benefits under the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan;
six months of premium payments for medical and dental insurance based on the applicable COBRA rates for the Named Executive Officer; and
for those Named Executive Officers who were participants prior to January 1, 2008, premium payments under the Officer Life Insurance Plan for the greater of ten years from commencement of plan participation or the number of years until the Named Executive Officer reaches age 65. For those Named Executive Officers who became participants on or after January 1, 2008, the participant will receive premium payments under the Officer Life Insurance Plan until retirement up to age 65.
Parker Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 63 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
The benefit in the following table for each of the Named Executive Officers under the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan represents one year of long term disability benefits. The disability benefit payable under the plan is funded through group and individual long-term disability insurance policies owned by each of the Named Executive Officers that would be paid by the insurance company issuing the policies.
PAYMENTS UPON LONG-TERM DISABILITY
Officer
| Accelerated
| Accelerated
| Pension
| Pension
| Supplemental
| LTIP
| Defined
| Executive
| Medical
| Officer
| Totals
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 3,395,122 | — | 621,388 | 5,225,679 | 22,658,045 | 8,430,201 | — | 396,000 | 6,558 | 40,531 | 40,773,524 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 83,676 | 731,043 | 1,304,219 | 2,856,363 | 5,653,245 | 2,003,143 | — | 396,000 | 3,198 | 20,495 | 13,051,382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 1,971,480 | 4,966,672 | 789,318 | 5,756,902 | 12,081,893 | 4,041,506 | — | 396,000 | 5,163 | 28,254 | 30,037,188 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | 150,782 | 2,483,846 | — | — | — | 1,074,407 | 3,323,043 | 420,000 | 10,158 | 38,218 | 7,500,454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | 306,969 | 1,021,760 | — | — | — | 900,118 | 1,773,014 | 420,000 | 10,248 | 42,542 | 4,474,651 |
Officer | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Incentives | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Units | Pension Plan | Pension Restoration Plan | Supplemental Retirement Program | LTIP Awards | Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | Executive Long- Term Disability Benefit | Medical and Dental Benefit | Officer Life Insurance Premiums | Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 23,502,089 | — | 1,116,891 | 10,812,719 | 11,089,168 | 12,878,372 | — | 396,000 | 7,266 | 33,314 | 59,835,819 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 918,036 | — | 679,636 | 975,942 | — | 1,694,053 | 35,540 | 420,000 | 11,418 | 49,686 | 4,784,311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 11,463,570 | 8,971,912 | 1,116,891 | 4,299,415 | 11,089,168 | 5,832,139 | — | 396,000 | 11,214 | 28,850 | 43,209,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 2,820,050 | — | — | — | — | 1,695,975 | 3,364,920 | 420,000 | 6,972 | 29,519 | 8,337,436 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 2,578,913 | 1,004,250 | — | — | — | 1,581,269 | 4,017,143 | 420,000 | 3,504 | 37,261 | 9,642,340 |
Payments upon Retirement
Upon the retirement of a Named Executive Officer at (A) age 65 or older, or (B) age 60 or older with at least ten years of service, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above and the “Payments Upon Death” described above, except that:
(i) | the vesting schedule in all outstanding Stock Incentives will continue as if employed; |
(ii) | the term for all outstanding Stock Incentives will continue for the remainder of theirten-year terms; |
(iii) | if the Named Executive Officer is (A) age 65 or older, or (B) age 60 or older with at least ten years of service and 12 months of continuous employment during the performance periods, he or she will receive a full LTIP Award payout for calendar years |
(iv) | the Named Executive Officer will not receive death benefits under the Officer Life Insurance Plan unless death subsequently occurs. |
If a Named Executive Officer retires outside of the age and service thresholds stated in (iii) above, he or she will receive(a) pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar years2017-18-19 and2018-19-202019-20-21 performance periods,period, to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the number of full calendar quarters served during each of the performance periods;period; and(b) pro-rated LTIP Award payout for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212020-21-22 and 2021-22-23 performance period,periods, to be determined at the end of the respective performance period,periods, based on the number of full months served during each of the performance period.periods.
64 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION TABLES
If the Named Executive Officer is less than 60 years of age on the date of retirement, then the Named Executive Officer must seek early retirement approval from the Human Resources and Compensation Committee to receive payments with respect to the following:
the Supplemental Retirement Program;
the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program; and
account balance in the unvested portion of the Named Executive Officer’s LTIP Award deferrals under our Executive Deferral Plan.
In addition, Named Executive Officers must be at least 55 years of age on the date of retirement to continue to receive premium payments under the Officer Life Insurance Plan which if needed will continue for the greater of ten years from commencement of plan participation or the number of years until they reach age 65. As of June 30, 2019,2021, Mr. Williams and Ms. Suever had reached 60 years of age with at least 10 years of service and Mr. Banks had reached 55 years of age with at least 10 years of service. Since Ms. Suever, Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier each became an executive officer after January 1, 2008, we will not make any post-retirement premium payments on their behalf.
In determining the amounts payable upon retirement reported in the following table, in the case of Messrs.Mr. Banks, and Malone and Ms. Parmentier, we assumed that theyhe did not receive Human Resources and Compensation Committee approval for early retirement.
PAYMENTS UPON RETIREMENT
Officer
| Pension
| Pension
| Supplemental
| LTIP
| Post-
| Totals
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 621,388 | 5,225,679 | 22,658,045 | 11,905,460 | 40,531 | 40,451,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 1,304,219 | 2,856,363 | 5,653,245 | 2,868,579 | — | 12,682,406 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 789,318 | 5,756,902 | — | 4,041,506 | 28,254 | 10,615,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone | — | — | — | 1,074,407 | — | 1,074,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | — | — | — | 900,118 | — | 900,118 |
Officer | Pension Plan | Pension Restoration Plan | Supplemental Retirement Program | LTIP Awards | Post- Retirement Insurance Premiums | Totals | ||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 862,730 | 7,053,691 | 28,356,152 | 19,844,834 | 99,942 | 56,217,349 | ||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 679,636 | 925,433 | — | 1,694,053 | — | 3,299,122 | ||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 1,116,891 | 10,812,719 | — | 5,832,139 | 201,950 | 17,963,699 | ||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | — | — | — | 1,695,975 | — | 1,695,975 | ||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | — | — | — | 1,581,269 | — | 1,581,269 |
Payments upon Termination for Cause or Resignation
Upon the termination for cause or the resignation of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above, except that the Named Executive Officer will (i) forfeit his or her Supplemental Retirement Program benefit and his or her Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program benefit if the termination for cause is the result of competition by the Named Executive Officer against us, and (ii) forfeit his or her LTIP Awards if the termination or resignation occurs during the applicable performance period.
In determining the amounts payable upon termination for cause under the Supplemental Retirement Program and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, we assumed that the termination did not result from competition against us.
Officer
| Pension
| Pension
| Supplemental
| Totals
| ||||
Thomas L. Williams | 621,388 | 5,225,679 | 22,658,045 | 28,505,112 | ||||
Catherine A. Suever | 1,304,219 | 2,856,363 | 5,653,245 | 9,813,827 | ||||
Lee C. Banks | 789,318 | 5,756,902 | — | 6,546,220 | ||||
Robert W. Malone | — | — | — | 0 | ||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | — | — | — | 0 |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 65 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION FOR CAUSE OR RESIGNATION
Officer | Pension Plan | Pension Restoration Plan |
Supplemental | Totals | ||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 862,730 | 7,053,691 | 28,356,152 | 36,272,573 | ||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 679,636 | 925,433 | — | 1,605,069 | ||||||
Lee C. Banks | 1,116,891 | 10,812,719 | — | 11,929,610 | ||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | — | — | — | — |
Payments upon Termination without Cause
Upon the termination without cause of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above. In addition, if the Named Executive Officer signs a release of all claims against us, the Named Executive Officer will receive a lump sum payment equal to one week’s pay for each full year of service up to a maximum oftwenty-six weeks of pay and continuation of premium payments for medical and dental insurance based on the applicable COBRA rates for the Named Executive Officer for up to three months.
Additionally, he or she will be entitled to(a) pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar yearyears 2017-18-192019-20-21 performance period, to be determined at the end of the performance period, based on the number of full calendar quarters served during the performance period; and (b) pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar years 2020-21-22 and2018-19-202021-22-23 performance periods, to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the number of full calendar quartersmonths served during each of the performance periods; and(b) pro-rated LTIP Award payout for the calendar year2019-20-21 performance period, to be determined at the end of the performance period, based on the number of full months served during the performance period.periods.
In determining the amounts payable upon termination without cause reported in the following tables, we assumed that the Named Executive Officer signed a release.
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE
Officer
| Severance
| Pension
| Pension
| Supplemental
| Medical and
| Totals
| ||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 336,532 | 621,388 | 5,225,679 | 22,658,045 | 3,279 | 28,844,923 | ||||||
Catherine A. Suever | 375,388 | 1,304,219 | 2,856,363 | 5,653,245 | 1,599 | 10,190,814 | ||||||
Lee C. Banks | 499,980 | 789,318 | 5,756,902 | 12,081,893 | 5,163 | 19,133,256 | ||||||
Robert W. Malone | 58,170 | — | — | — | 5,079 | 63,249 | ||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier | 123,750 | — | — | — | 5,124 | 128,874 |
Officer
| Severance
| Pension
| Pension
|
Supplemental
| Medical and
| Totals
| ||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 411,307 | 862,730 | 7,053,691 | 28,356,152 | 3,633 | 36,687,513 | ||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 340,693 | 679,636 | 925,433 | — | 5,709 | 1,951,471 | ||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 530,589 | 1,116,891 | 10,812,719 | 11,089,168 | 5,607 | 23,554,974 | ||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 190,230 | — | — | — | 3,486 | 193,716 | ||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 94,242 | — | — | — | 1,752 | 95,994 |
Payments upon a Change in Control
A Change in Control occurs if and when:
subject to certain exceptions, any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) is or becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing 20% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board of Directors;
during any period of 24 consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such24-month period were our Directors, which we refer to as the Incumbent Board, cease to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors, unless the election, or nomination for election, of any person becoming a Director subsequent to the beginning of such24-month period was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Board;
66 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION TABLES
our shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution; or
we enter into a merger, consolidation or other reorganization, or sell all of our assets, unless:
immediately following the business combination, (1) more than 50% of the total voting power eligible to elect Directors of the resulting entity is represented by shares that were common shares immediately prior to the business combination, (2) subject to certain exceptions, no person becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the voting power of the entity resulting from the business combination, and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board of Directors of the resulting entity were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the approval by the Board of Directors of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such business combination; or
the business combination is effected by means of the acquisition of common shares from us, and the Board of Directors approves a resolution providing expressly that such business combination does not constitute a Change in Control.
On July 21, 2008, we adopted certain amendments to our deferred compensation plans and arrangements to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The amendments included certain modifications to the above definition of “Change in Control” for purposes of those plans and arrangements which were necessary to comply with the definition required by Section 409A.
A Change in Control, either with or without a qualifying termination of a Named Executive Officer (as described below in “Payments upon a Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control”), has the following effects under the executive compensation plans:
any outstanding unvested Stock Incentive held by a Named Executive Officer vests and becomes exercisable immediately upon a Change in Control;
any outstanding LTIP Award will be paid in common shares equal to the greater of (i) the target LTIP Award or (ii) the LTIP Award that would be payable at the end of the performance period assuming a level of financial performance equivalent to that existing at the fiscal quarter end immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control;
upon a Change in Control, all amounts previously deferred by a Named Executive Officer under the Executive Deferral Plan, together with a “make whole” amount designed to compensate the executive for the lost opportunity to continue to defer receipt of such income (and the earnings thereon) pursuant to elections made under the Executive Deferral Plan, will be paid to the executive;
upon a Change in Control, under the Supplemental Retirement Program each Named Executive Officer will receive three additional years of age and service credit, alump-sum payment equal to the present value of the participant’s vested benefit under the Supplemental Retirement Program, and a“gross-up” payment to offset the effect, if any, of the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on such lump sum payment; and
upon a Change in Control, any unvested account balance in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program is automatically vested and such account shall be increased by three additional years ofnon-discretionary employer contributions based on the Named Executive Officer’s salary grade and target compensation at the time of the Change in Control. Such increase will not reflect deemed interest and earnings.
In determining the amounts payable upon a Change in Control reported in the following tables, the following assumptions or principles were used.
We used the same assumptions in “Payments Generally Available” described above.
We assumed that the Change in Control met the requirements of a Change in Control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 67 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
For Stock Incentives that vested on the triggering event, we valued the Stock Incentives at an amount per share equal to the difference between our closing stock price on June 30, 2019, $170.01,2021, $307.11, and the grant price per share for each of the Stock Incentives.
For lump sum present values for the Supplemental Retirement Program, we assumed a 1.00%0.0% discount rate for a Change in Control that meets the requirements under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and a 2.89%2.50% discount rate for a Change in Control that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A. In both instances, we used the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.
To calculate the value of the LTIP Awards, we assumed a payout of 100% of the target LTIP Award and used our closing stock price on June 30, 2019, $170.01.2021, $307.11. Because the payout of the LTIP Awards is dependent upon the financial performance against the Peer Group equivalent to that existing at the fiscal quarter end immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control, a Named Executive Officer’s actual payout could range from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 200% of the Named Executive Officer’s target LTIP Award.
Officer | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Incentives | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Units | Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program | Pension Plan | Pension Restoration Plan(1) | Supplemental Retirement Program(1) | Executive Deferral Plan(1) | LTIP Awards | Excise and Related Income Tax Gross-Up | Totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams |
| 4,371,578 |
| — |
| — |
| 621,388 |
| 5,225,679 |
| 32,019,602 |
| 2,291 |
| 16,579,205 |
| 0 |
| 58,819,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever |
| 340,725 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,304,219 |
| 2,856,363 |
| 11,884,976 |
| 69,692 |
| 4,118,152 |
| 2,822,417 |
| 23,396,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks |
| 2,431,056 |
| 2,413,122 |
| — |
| 789,318 |
| 5,756,902 |
| 22,384,997 |
| 1,692,896 |
| 7,815,870 |
| 8,438,333 |
| 51,722,494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone |
| 271,382 |
| — |
| 3,682,413 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,074,462 |
| 1,770,348 |
| 7,798,605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier |
| 388,907 |
| — |
| 2,045,779 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,827,437 |
| 1,066,964 |
| 5,329,087 |
68 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION TABLES
PAYMENTS UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL
Officer | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Incentives | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Units |
Defined | Pension Plan(1) | Pension Restoration Plan(1) | Supplemental Retirement Program | Executive Deferral Plan | LTIP Awards | Excise and Related Income Tax Gross-Up | Totals | ||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams
| 23,502,089 | — | — | 862,730 | 7,053,691 | 44,336,726 | 1,521 | 24,823,087 | — | 100,579,844 | ||||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno
| 918,036 | — | 681,760 | 679,636 | 925,433 | — | 47,231 | 4,320,423 | 2,485,569 | 10,058,088 | ||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks
| 11,463,570 | 8,971,912 | — | 1,116,891 | 10,812,719 | 24,821,578 | 1,522,676 | 11,285,371 | 16,586,025 | 86,580,742 | ||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti
| 2,820,050 | — | 3,816,653 | — | — | — | 118,800 | 3,360,398 | — | 10,115,901 | ||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks
| 2,578,913 | 1,004,250 | 4,431,192 | — | — | — | — | 3,130,986 | — | 11,145,341 |
(1) | If the Change in Control does not meet the requirements of a Change in Control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, payment at the time of the Change in Control is “0”. There would also be a corresponding reduction in the excise and related income taxgross-up, and in each of the Named Executive Officers’ total payments. |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 69 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
Payments upon a Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control
Each of the Change in Control Agreements requires two triggering events to result in any severance payments to the Named Executive Officers:
Change in Control; and
termination of the employment of the Named Executive Officer in connection with a Change in Control.
Each Change in Control Agreement provides that, if the employment of the Named Executive Officer is terminated during the three years following a Change in Control, or prior to a Change in Control, where the termination was in anticipation of the Change in Control, either by us without “Cause” (as defined in the Change in Control Agreements) or by the Named Executive Officer for “Good Reason” (as described below), the Named Executive Officer shall be entitled to receive the “Payments upon a Change in Control” described above and the following:
pro rata base salary, unused vacation, and annual cash and long-term incentive compensation for the year of termination of employment;
severance pay equal to three times the Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary and annual cash incentive compensation, other than Converted RONA Bonuses;
continuation of welfare benefits (e.g., medical, life insurance, disability coverage) for a period of three years;
to the extent not previously received, all amounts previously deferred under ournon-qualified income deferral plans, together with a “make-whole” amount as described above, where the Named Executive Officer’s termination occurs within two years of a Change in Control that constitutes a “change in control” as defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; and
a“gross-up” payment to offset the effect, if any, of the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
“Good Reason” for termination of employment by the Named Executive Officer includes diminution in duties, reduction in compensation or benefits, relocation, or resignation from employment by the executive for any or no reason during the180-day period beginning on the 91st day after the Change in Control.
Officer | Severance | Accelerated | Accelerated | Defined | Pension | Pension | Supplemental | Executive | LTIP | Executive | Medical | Officer | Excise and | Totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams |
| 9,375,000 |
| 4,371,578 |
| — |
| — |
| 621,388 |
| 5,225,679 |
| 32,019,602 |
| 2,291 |
| 16,579,205 |
| 12,159 |
| 39,348 |
| 243,763 |
| 8,312,697 |
| 76,802,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catherine A. Suever |
| 4,164,480 |
| 340,725 |
| 731,043 |
| — |
| 1,304,219 |
| 2,856,363 |
| 11,884,976 |
| 69,692 |
| 4,118,152 |
| 12,297 |
| 19,188 |
| 132,753 |
| 4,195,185 |
| 29,829,073 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks |
| 6,000,000 |
| 2,431,056 |
| 4,966,672 |
| — |
| 789,318 |
| 5,756,902 |
| 22,384,997 |
| 1,692,896 |
| 7,815,870 |
| 8,476 |
| 61,956 |
| 160,225 |
| 10,403,732 |
| 62,472,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Malone |
| 2,932,500 |
| 271,382 |
| 2,483,846 |
| 3,682,413 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,074,462 |
| 11,466 |
| 60,948 |
| 159,300 |
| 2,779,323 |
| 14,455,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer A. Parmentier |
| 2,895,900 |
| 388,907 |
| 1,021,760 |
| 2,045,779 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,827,437 |
| 9,817 |
| 61,488 |
| 105,105 |
| 2,045,013 |
| 10,401,206 |
70 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
COMPENSATION TABLES
PAYMENTS UPON A QUALIFYING TERMINATION IN CONNECTION WITH A CHANGE IN CONTROL
Officer | Severance Pay | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Incentives | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Units |
Defined | Pension Plan | Pension Restoration Plan | Supplemental Retirement Program(1) | Executive Deferral Plan | LTIP Awards | Executive Long- Term Disability Premiums | Medical and Dental Benefits | Officer Life Insurance Premiums | Excise and Related Income Tax Gross-Up | Totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas L. Williams | 13,360,702 | 23,502,089 | — | — | 862,730 | 7,053,691 | 44,336,726 | 1,521 | 24,823,087 | 7,266 | 43,596 | 99,942 | 24,340,389 | 138,431,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Todd M. Leombruno | 2,393,207 | 918,036 | — | 681,760 | 679,636 | 925,433 | — | 47,231 | 4,320,423 | 11,418 | 68,508 | 149,058 | 4,605,985 | 14,800,695 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee C. Banks | 8,101,081 | 11,463,570 | 8,971,912 | — | 1,116,891 | 10,812,719 | 24,821,578 | 1,522,676 | 11,285,371 | 11,214 | 67,284 | 86,550 | 21,249,058 | 99,509,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph R. Leonti | 4,289,986 | 2,820,050 | — | 3,816,653 | — | — | — | 118,800 | 3,360,398 | 6,972 | 41,832 | 88,556 | 5,426,903 | 19,970,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew M. Weeks | 3,673,849 | 2,578,913 | 1,004,250 | 4,431,192 | — | — | — | — | 3,130,986 | 3,504 | 21,024 | 111,782 | 5,567,892 | 20,523,392 |
(1) | If the Change in Control does not meet the requirements of a Change in Control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, payment at the time of the qualifying termination in connection with a Change in Control is as follows. Mr. Williams—$30,846,872; Mr. Leombruno—$0; Mr. Banks—$14,484,779; Mr. Leonti—$0; and Mr. Weeks—$0. There would also be a corresponding reduction in the excise and related income taxgross-up in the total payments for each of the Named Executive Officers. |
Payments to Ms. Suever
In connection with her retirement in December 2020, Ms. Suever was entitled to and did receive the following:
a lump sum payment under the Pension Restoration Plan and Supplemental Retirement Program as reflected in “Payments During Last Fiscal Year” column of the Pension Benefits for Fiscal Year 2021 table with the benefits in the Pension Restoration Plan and Supplemental Retirement Program paid in accordance with the terms of each of these plans;
payment of a portion of her account under the Savings Restoration Plan and Executive Deferral Plan as reported in the “Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions” column of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2021 table, with the remaining balance in the Executive Deferral Plan to be distributed in accordance with the terms of the plan; and
Ms. Suever received her full LTIP Award payout for calendar year 2018-19-2020, and will receive her full LTIP award payout for calendar years 2019-20-21 and 2020-21-22 performance periods at the end of the respective performance periods.
Since Ms. Suever became an executive officer after January 1, 2008, the Company will not make any post-retirement premium payments on her behalf under the Officers Life Insurance Plan.
| Parker-Hannifin Corporation | ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 71 |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIOCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Williams, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our median employee.team member.
Our pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employeeteam member and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’steam member’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Therefore, the estimated pay ratio we report may not be comparable to the pay ratios reported by other companies and should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.
As reported in the Summary Compensation Table, our Chief Executive Officer had annual total compensation for fiscal year 20192021 of $17,472,500.$17,034,500. Using this Summary Compensation Table methodology, the annual total compensation of our median employeeteam member for fiscal year 20192021 was $57,282.$56,274. As a result, we estimate that the ratio of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation to that of our median employeeteam member for fiscal year 20192021 was 305303 to 1.
For purposes of the fiscal year 20192021 Chief Executive Officer pay ratio set forth above, we used the same median employeemedian-paid team member identified with respect to our fiscal year 20182020 Chief Executive Officer pay ratio, as there has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure.
72 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table sets forth compensation information for ournon-employee Directors for fiscal year 2019.2021.
Name(1) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock ($)(2) | All Other Compensation (3)($) | Total ($) | Fees Earned or | Stock Awards ($)(3) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||
Jillian C. Evanko | 63,839 | 136,706 | 918 | 201,463 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lance M. Fritz | 63,839 | 136,706 | 918 | 201,463 | ||||||||||||||||||
Linda A. Harty | 165,500 | 159,454 | 2,079 | 327,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
William F. Lacey | 26,444 | 114,526 | 309 | 141,279 | ||||||||||||||||||
Kevin A. Lobo | 140,500 | 159,454 | 2,079 | 302,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
Candy M. Obourn | 142,500 | 159,454 | 2,079 | 304,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
Joseph Scaminace | 165,500 | 159,454 | 12,079 | 337,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
Åke Svensson | 142,500 | 159,454 | 2,079 | 304,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
Laura K. Thompson | 142,500 | 159,454 | 2,079 | 304,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
James R. Verrier | 140,500 | 159,454 | 2,079 | 302,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
James L. Wainscott | 202,500 | 159,454 | 12,079 | 374,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert G. Bohn | 136,667 | 132,143 | 2,160 | 270,970 | 70,263 | 32,328 | 551 | 103,142 | ||||||||||||||
Linda S. Harty | 162,000 | 132,143 | 3,160 | 297,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
Kevin A. Lobo | 143,667 | 132,143 | 2,160 | 277,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Candy M. Obourn | 162,000 | 132,143 | 2,160 | 296,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
Joseph Scaminace | 136,667 | 132,143 | 12,160 | 280,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Åke Svensson | 138,667 | 132,143 | 2,160 | 272,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Laura K. Thompson | 61,720 | 106,160 | 1,014 | 168,894 | ||||||||||||||||||
James R. Verrier | 138,674 | 132,143 | 2,160 | 272,977 | ||||||||||||||||||
James L. Wainscott | 192,000 | 132,143 | 12,160 | 336,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Kohlhepp(4) | 43,333 | — | — | 43,333 | ||||||||||||||||||
Klaus-Peter Müller(4) | 43,333 | — | — | 43,333 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wolfgang R. Schmitt(4) | 43,333 | — | — | 43,333 |
(1) | Thomas L. Williams, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and Lee C. Banks, our |
(2) | Reflects a 10% decrease in cash retainer in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 as a result of company-wide cost control measures related to COVID-19 and the economic downturn. |
(3) | This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan in fiscal year |
(4) | The amounts reported in this column include (a) the value of the dividend equivalent units earned as additional RSUs on the unvested RSUs granted in fiscal year |
|
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are also our employeesteam members do not receive any additional compensation for their services as Directors. During fiscal year 2019,2021, non-employee Directors received an annual retainer, meeting fees (if applicable), and a restricted stock unit award. Ournon-employee Directors are also eligible to participate in our Matching Gifts Program as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. The following table reflects the annual retainers of thenon-employee Directors were effective during fiscal year 2019:2021 and the increases to be effective as of October 27, 2021 in fiscal year 2022:
Approved August 17, 2016 | Approved August 15 and September 7, 2018 | |||||||
Effective beginning 10/26/2016 | Effective beginning 10/24/2018 | |||||||
Annual retainer for the Lead Director and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair: | $ | 170,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||
Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair: | $ | 150,000 | $ | 165,000 | ||||
Annual retainer for Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair: | $ | 150,000 | $ | 165,000 | ||||
Annual retainer fornon-Chair Committee members: | $ | 130,000 | $ | 140,000 |
Approved | ||
Annual Retainers | Effective beginning | |
Lead Director and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair: | $ 200,000 | |
Audit Committee Chair: | $ 165,000 | |
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair: | $ 165,000 | |
Non-Chair Committee members: | $ 140,000 |
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 73 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
As part of our company-wide cost control actions in response to COVID-19 and the economic downturn, our Directors’ cash retainers were reduced by 10% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021.
In addition to the annual retainers described above,non-employee Directors wereare entitled to receive a $2,000 fee for attending each Board of Directors or Committee meeting that exceeds the number of regularly scheduled Board of Directors and relevantor Committee meetings in a fiscal year by more than two. DuringOn that basis, in fiscal year 2019,2021:
Mses. Obourn and Thompson and Messrs. Lobo, Svensson Verrier and Wainscott each received three additional payments of $2,000; and
Mses. Evanko and Harty and Obourn attended one extra Board meetingMessrs. Fritz, Lobo, Scaminace and Verrier each resulting in anreceived two additional paymentpayments of $2,000 to each of them.$2,000.
During fiscal year 2019,2021, Directors could elect to defer all or a portion of their annual retainers under our Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.
Each Director who was serving as a Director on October 24, 201828, 2020 and who was not a current employee was granted 902729 RSUs under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan. Ms. Thompson joined the Board of Directors on January 23, 2019Evanko’s and received aMr. Fritz’s pro-rated award of 677 RSUs.547 RSUs granted in January 2021 will vest on January 27, 2022; Mr. Lacey’s pro-rated award of 365 RSUs granted in April 2021 will vest on April 22, 2022. The terms of the RSUs provide that the RSUs will vest 100% on the later of (a) one year from the grant date; or (b) on the date of our next Annual Shareholders Meeting, also known as, in each case, the Vesting Date, except that if a Director ceases to be a Director for any reason prior to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders that occurs after the grant date, apro-rated portion of her or his RSUs will vest on the Vesting Date and the remaining RSUs will be forfeited. All RSUs earn dividend equivalent units paid as additional RSUs, which are subject to the terms and conditions of the original RSU award and are payable directly to each Director to whom they are issued.
74 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors consists of five Directors, each of whom is independent as defined in our Independence Standards for Directors and in compliance with the independence standards applicable to audit committee members in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and under the federal securities laws. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which is available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2021, with management and with Deloitte & Touche LLP, or D&T, our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.2021.
The Audit Committee has discussed with D&T the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and letter from D&T required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding D&T’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with D&T its independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2021, filed with the SEC.
Audit Committee:
Linda S.A. Harty, Chair
Robert G. Bohn
Kevin A. Lobo
Åke Svensson
Laura K. Thompson
James R. Verrier
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 75 |
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for the selection, retention and recommendation of our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to appoint, compensate, retain, oversee, evaluate and, where appropriate, terminate, our independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee ensures the regular evaluation and rotation of the lead D&T audit partner. The Audit Committee recommends ratification of its appointment of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.2022. D&T served as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2021, and has served as our independent auditor since fiscal year 2008. A representative of D&T is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and available to respond to appropriate questions, and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.
Audit Fees and All Other Fees
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed, or expected to be billed, for audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees (compliance and planning), and all other fees for services rendered by D&T for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019,2021, and 2018:2020:
Twelve Months Ended June 30, | ||||
2019 | 2018 | |||
Audit Fees. Fees for auditing our annual consolidated financial statements, reviewing our interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q filed with the SEC and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. | $8,193,000 | $7,726,000 | ||
Audit-Related Fees. Fees for assurance and related services provided to us that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not included in “Audit Fees.” Fiscal year 2019 fees related primarily to audit procedures, internal control reviews and reporting requirements resulting from US Tax reform, new leasing standards, new revenue recognition standards, and the potential acquisition of LORD Corporation. Fiscal year 2018 fees related primarily to audit procedures required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters and internal control review. | $354,000 | $1,249,000 | ||
Tax Fees—Compliance. Fees billed with respect to tax compliance services, such as global assistance in preparing various types of tax returns. | $944,000 | $989,000 | ||
Tax Fees—Planning. Fees billed for tax planning services. | $305,000 | $455,000 | ||
All Other Fees. Fiscal year 2019 fees billed were in connection with integration consultation services related to the potential acquisition of LORD Corporation and services that are not otherwise included in the above categories are for services that are not otherwise included in the above categories (e.g., training sessions). Fiscal year 2018 fees billed are for services that are not otherwise included in the above categories (e.g., training sessions). | $742,000 | $2,000 |
Twelve Months Ended
| ||||
2021
| 2020
| |||
Audit Fees. Fees for auditing our annual consolidated financial statements, reviewing our interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
| $8,525,000 | $7,998,000 | ||
Audit-Related Fees. Fees for assurance and related services provided to us that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not included in “Audit Fees.” Fiscal year 2021 and 2020 fees related primarily to the acquisitions of LORD Corporation and Exotic Metals.
| $675,000 | $895,000 | ||
Tax Fees—Compliance. Fees billed with respect to tax compliance services, such as global assistance in preparing various types of tax returns. | $782,278 | $853,095 | ||
Tax Fees—Planning. Fees billed for tax planning services.
| $791,815 | $734,861 | ||
All Other Fees. Fiscal year 2020 fees billed were in connection with integration consultation services related to the acquisitions of LORD Corporation and Exotic Metals and services that are not otherwise included in the above categories (e.g., training sessions).
| $— | $2,294,419 |
Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and ProceduresProcedures..
In accordance with the SEC’s rules issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require, among other things, that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Audit Committee of all professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm. The policy specifically provides for the pre-approval of certain permissible services up to a budgeted amount to be determined annually by the Audit Committee. All other services require Audit Committee approval on a case-by-case basis. All of the services described in “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with our formal policy on auditor independence.
Under this policy, the Audit Committee can also pre-approve estimated fees for permissible non-audit services that may arise in the ordinary course of business. Before engaging our independent registered public accounting firm for such ordinary course services, (i) the services and fees are reviewed to ensure compliance with the policy by the independent registered public accounting firm, our Vice President and Controller, and the Company employeesteam members requesting the services and (ii) the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company
76 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
PROXY STATEMENT - ITEM 2
confirm the services are permissible under the SEC and PCAOB independence rules. The Audit Committee is informed quarterly as to the status of pre-approved services actually provided by the independent auditor. This policy does not delegate the Audit Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve all services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm.
The Chair of the Audit Committee has been authorized by the Audit Committee to pre-approve services arising during the year that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee at the time of the annual audit services engagement, subject to predefined financial limits set by the Audit Committee. Services that are pre-approved by the Audit Committee Chair are then communicated to, and ratified by, the full Audit Committee at the Audit Committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.
Ratification of the appointment of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020,2022, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020,2022, is in our best interest and the best interest of our shareholders.
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 2: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF D&T AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2022. |
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 2:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR
THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF D&T AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2020.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 2021 Proxy Statement ◆ 77 |
ITEM 3 – PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ON ANON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related SEC rules, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We encourage our shareholders to carefully read this Proxy Statement in its entirety before deciding whether or not to vote for or against this Item 3.
At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders voted in favor of annual frequency for thenon-binding, advisory approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. The nextnon-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers is expected to take place at our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
As described in detail throughout our Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 2324 of this Proxy Statement, and as summarized in the “Executive Summary—Fiscal Year 2019”2021” section of this Proxy Statement, our executive compensation program features, among other things, the following:
A“pay-for-performance” structure which ensures that a significant portion of the compensation for our executive officers is“at-risk,” is dependent on the short-term and long-term performance of our business and encourages and rewards performance that drives the key goals, operational priorities and metrics that we use to profitably grow our business and enhance shareholder value;
A structure which ensures that our executive compensation program aligns the interests of our executive officers and our shareholders, is not overly weighted towards annual cash incentive compensation and does not otherwise have the potential to threaten long-term shareholder value by promoting unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by our executive officers;
A structure consistent with our philosophy of targeting executive compensation at market median, which allows us to remain competitive with companies that compete with us for talented employeesteam members and shareholder investment;
Various executive compensation practices that contribute to good corporate governance, including a “claw-back” policy, stock ownership guidelines for Directors and executive officers, hedging, pledging and other stock ownership restrictions, and an annual compensation risk review; and
Effective oversight and decision-making by a highly-independent Board of Directors and a Human Resources and Compensation Committee consisting entirely of independent Directors that retains an independent executive compensation consultant.
The vote on this Item 3 isnon-binding and advisory in nature, which means that the vote is not binding on us, our Board of Directors or any of the Committees of our Board of Directors. However, our Board of Directors values the views of our shareholders and our Board of Directors and Human Resources and Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into account when addressing future compensation policies and decisions.
78 ◆ 2021 Proxy Statement | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
PROXY STATEMENT - ITEM 3
Our Board of Directors believes that our executive compensation program is reasonable and well-structured, satisfies its objectives and philosophies and is worthy of shareholder support. Accordingly, our Board of Directors requests that our shareholders vote to approve the following resolution:
RESOLVED,that the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussions, is approved on anon-binding, advisory basis.
|
|
|
Vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
If you are a participant in one of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation employee saving plans, your telephone or Internet vote must be received by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 21, 2019 to be counted in the final tabulation. Otherwise, your vote must be received by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 23, 2019 to be counted in the final tabulation.
If voting by telephone or Internet, please do not mail this proxy/voting instruction.
¤ Proxy/voting instruction must be signed and dated below. Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing. ¤
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on October 23, 2019.
The undersigned hereby appoints THOMAS L. WILLIAMS, CATHERINE A. SUEVER and JOSEPH R. LEONTI, and any of them, as proxies to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Parker-Hannifin Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held on October 23, 2019, and at any adjournment(s) thereof, on the proposals more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Meeting in the manner specified herein and on any other business that may properly come before the Meeting.
This card also serves as voting instructions to Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee for shares held in the Parker Retirement Savings Plan, to Sun Life Financial Trust, as Trustee for the Deferred Profit Sharing Plan, Employee Profit Sharing Plan and the Registered Retirement Savings Plan and to Computershare, Inc. and Link Asset Services, as the administrators for the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Trustee of the Parker Retirement Savings Plan will vote all uninstructed and unallocated shares in the same proportion as the shares for which the Trustee receives voting instructions.
ADMISSION CARD
Please bring this ticket and a photo ID if you attend the Annual Meeting.
It will expedite your admittance when presented upon your arrival.
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
at27, 2021 9:00 a.m., EDT
Company’s Headquarters
6035 Parkland Boulevard
Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
¤ Please foldThe undersigned hereby appoints THOMAS L. WILLIAMS, TODD M. LEOMBRUNO and detach Admission CardJOSEPH R. LEONTI, and any of them, as proxies to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Parker-Hannifin Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at perforation if attending the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held on October 27, 2021, and at any adjournment(s) thereof, on the proposals more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Meeting in the manner specified herein and on any other business that may properly come before the Meeting.¤
ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO FUTURE DOCUMENTS NOW AVAILABLE
You can electThis card also serves as voting instructions to view futureFidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee for shares held in the Parker Retirement Savings Plan, and to Computershare, Inc. and Link Asset Services, as the administrators for the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Annual ReportsGlobal Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Trustee of the Parker Retirement Savings Plan will vote all uninstructed and Proxy Statements over the Internet, instead of receiving paper copiesunallocated shares in the mail. Providing these documents oversame proportion as the Internet can saveshares for which the Corporation the cost of producing and mailing them. Participation is completely voluntary. If you give your consent, in the future, when, as and if the Corporation elects to provide these documents over the Internet, you will receive notification that will contain the Internet location where the documents are available. There is no cost to you for this service other than any charges you may incur from your Internet provider and telephone and/or cable company. Once you give your consent, it will remain in effect until you inform us otherwise in writing.
To give your consent, follow the prompts when you vote by telephone or over the Internet, or check the appropriate box located at the bottom of the attached proxy/Trustee receives voting instruction when you vote by mail.
Proxy/voting instruction must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
¤ Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing. ¤instructions.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION ATTN: JOSEPH R. LEONTI 6035 PARKLAND BLVD. CLEVELAND, OH 44124-4141 | VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go towww.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 26, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 24, 2021 for shares held in one of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation employee savings plans. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting Instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PH2021 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 26, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 24, 2021 for shares held in one of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation employee savings plans. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark. Sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/oBroadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If you vote by Internet or Phone, please do not mail this Proxy Card |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | D59283-P60696 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — | ||
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY | ||
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONS. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES ANDFOR ITEMS 2 3, AND 4 ANDAGAINST ITEM 5.3.
|
Election of the following individuals as Directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2022.
Nominees (continued):
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | |||||||||||||||
(01) | Lee C. Banks | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | (07) | Åke Svensson | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | |||||||||||
(02) | Robert G. Bohn | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | (08) | Laura K. Thompson | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | |||||||||||
(03) | Linda S. Harty | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | (09) | James R. Verrier | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | |||||||||||
(04) | Kevin A. Lobo | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | (10) | James L. Wainscott | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | |||||||||||
(05) | Candy M. Obourn | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | (11) | Thomas L. Williams | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ | |||||||||||
(06) | Joseph Scaminace | ❑ | ❑ | ❑ |
For
| Against |
Abstain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nominees: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1a. | Lee C. Banks | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 1j. James R. Verrier | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||
1b. | Jillian C. Evanko | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 1k. James L. Wainscott | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||
1c. | Lance M. Fritz | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 1l. Thomas L. Williams | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||
1d. | Linda A. Harty | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 2. Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. 3. Approval of, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. NOTE: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||
1e. 1f. 1g. 1h. 1i. | William F. Lacey Kevin A. Lobo Joseph Scaminace Åke Svensson Laura K. Thompson | ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ | ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ | ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT – THIS PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.